US Naval Air Force admits UFO sightings

7 28. 04. 2019
6th international conference of exopolitics, history and spirituality

US Naval Air Force puts together instructions for its pilots other ground personnel to do if they observe UFOs. The intention is to establish an official procedure for collecting and analyzing data from such cases.

A number of unannounced observations have become the motive for such a guide, as the Army Intelligence Service (MI) reported unknown objects (UFOs), which showed unusual flight abilities exceeding the capabilities of NAVY fighter pilots and other defensive ground elements - such as radar interference.

"Over the past few years, we have indirectly learned of several dozen observations of unidentifiable flying machines that have entered the militarily guarded area without any further authorization or authorization.", explains NAVY in for Politico server. “For security reasons, the Air Force takes these reports very seriously. We are interested in exploring each case. ”

“For the sake of the cause, the Navy has decided to update and formalize the process by which reports of such observations can be easily reported. The procedure itself is currently under design.

NAVY is a straightforward admission that the observed objects are de facto alien ships (ETV) avoids. But it is generally known that there have been a number of mysterious observations before, made by trusted and well-trained military personnel who have somewhere in the archives to record or report. Certainly they had to be examined and analyzed by someone to assess whether they pose a security risk to the state.

Chris Mellon is a former Pentagon intelligence officer and also a former member of the Senate Commission on Intelligence. He said he was trying to formalize the reports on unexplained air phenomena (UAP) to o unidentified flying objects (UFO) would certainly be a great shift to new waters.

Mellon said: "The current situation is that UFOs and UAPs (or ETVs) are treated as anomalies that are ignored - instead of being explored." Literally added: "We have processes that are throwing away this kind of information."

Mellon also mentioned the example: “In many cases, the [military employee] has no idea what to do with such information. Whether it's satellite data, radar observations, or something that exceeds our technology speed limits. They just drop or ignore the data because it's not a conventional plane or missile. '

The interest of Congress members rose after the 2017 server revelations Political a New Your Timeswhen the Pentagon founded the 2007 inside Defense Security Agency (DIA) a special office known as AATIP, studying unambiguous UAP (or ETV) observations. It happened at the urging of Senator Harry Red, Ted Stevens and Daniel Inouy, who together provided the necessary resources for the project.

The office spent about 577 million CZK ($ 25 million) to analyze technical studies and evaluate numerous unexplained observations. These included brief meetings as well as the case when 2004 ETV was observed for a few days off the deck by ship American 11. assault military fleet. Several times, fighters were sent out of the ships trying to hit ETV, but in vain. ETV moved beyond the physical and technical boundaries of human-designed aircraft.

Raytheon, main defense contractor, utilized news and official video Ministry of Defense obtained from an observation off the coast of California to demonstrate new radar equipment on the data collected. He is not the only one who has craved Aviation Navy (NAVY) to provide more information on these phenomena.

Army Intelligence Service (AI) for Politico said: "Building on the growing demands of Congress members and other government suppliers, NAVY representatives have organized briefings through their secret service intelligence agents. They were also attended by airmen, who in the context of the case reported potential dangers in air traffic.

NAVY refused to specify who was informed in this way and to what extent. Representatives Air Force (US AirForce) did not comment on this issue at all.

Proponents of the idea that such observations should be treated a priori as a potential threat to national security have long been criticizing military officials. They mind that they are paying little attention to this phenomenon and are still supporting collective consciousness, in which many military employees and lower government officials fear that an open discussion of the topic around ET / UAP / UFO could lead to their career damage and loss of personal credibility .

Luis Elizondo is a former Pentagon official who was the AATIP project manager. He complained openly in several national media that the Pentagon's access to secured ETV observations was absurdly cold - without much interest.

Elizondo said: “When you work in a civil air traffic at a busy airport and find out something unusual, you're motivated to inform your superiors. In the case of our army, it's just the opposite: If you see anything, don't tell anyone about it!"

He also added: "Just because those mysterious planes don't have identification numbers or flags on their tail or wings - or even they have no tail or wing ... what will happen in five years when we find out that they are some highly developed Russian aircraft?"

 

Sueneé: From Elizonda, the last comment is just a step aside for better public relations. Open: "Watching us aliens" and not lose credibility is still difficult. Surely there is no Russian or German, French… super-secret aircraft. In this, all the secret service representatives of the listed states were already clearing 50 very early. years, when the aliens were really intensely involved in the observation of military activities, especially over the territory of the US and the former Soviet Union (today's Russia). One of the key reasons was weapons of mass destruction - atomic weapons.

The whole problem described above has its light and dark sides. The light is certainly the fact that the public is once again inconspicuously informed that there is something going on and that there is another player in the air who has (and historically had) total dominance over (not only) American air and ground defense. The dark side of things is still there (and unfortunately it has also been since 50 years) that certain aspects of military rhetoric have not changed: It is a threat to be defended. Which is a variation on your password: First I shoot and then I ask who you are.

Lus Elizondo at the end of the year 2017 took a fuss in the mainstream media, for he was the one who openly claimed that the AATIP project was dealing with ETV observation and it was he who complained that although he was successful, was officially closed. More precisely, it is quite likely that the project has been transferred to a deeper level of secrecy, its agenda passed to better-tested people, and continues to work under a different label.

AATIP was a project that dealt exclusively with observations where the classification was clear. If we know that this is not a secret project of our or any other world power and finds no unknown atmospheric phenomenon, then there is only the last possibility of observing and manifesting ETV.

Why is the matter constantly kept secret and why is there more and more uncovering of the truth about 74 years later? OUTPUT by Dr. Steven Greer, published in collaboration between the editors Suene Universe, zs and Nakladatelství PRÁH, as. From the original 1200 stock we have only less than 290 in our shop.

Buy

Elizondo will soon be appearing in the upcoming documentary series on researching the ET / ETV phenomenon in the Pentagon, where he has worked for many years. He said literally that a six-part documentary reveals recent ETV / UAP observations recorded by military pilots.

Both Elizodno and Mellon are involved in the project Academy of Sciences and Arts to the Stars (To The Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences), which supports the research of the technical skills ETV demonstrates.

Similar articles