Yes, we were on the moon!

3 10. 04. 2022
6th international conference of exopolitics, history and spirituality

100x evidence that we were on the moon:

  1. There are many witnesses who have been involved in both preparation and implementation.
  2. The first landing on the Moon was transmitted live by television across the world.
  3. There are thousands of photographs and kilometers of film strip from all Apollo missions.
  4. Anyone can verify that artifacts remain on the moon after the landing. Just look through the telescope.
  5. Astronauts are direct witnesses - they were there!
  6. The Moon has been repeatedly sent probes that have taken landing sites and artifacts in place.
  7. The whole affair was under the blur of Russia, with which America had competed.

There are many witnesses who have been involved in both preparation and implementation: As with the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, it is argued that someone would have to know. We know that someone knows about it, but no one dares to talk about it. Already 100 years ago, Tesla offered the world technology as a source of free energy and antigravity. Just as the development of the first atomic bomb was kept secret for many years and only about 6 people knew about the real nature of the problem (and thousands of people across the United States participated in the implementation), then it is similar to the space program. Very few people knew about his true nature.

The first landing on the Moon was transmitted by television across the world. There are witnesses who were involved in the technical provision of the audio and video signal transmission during the mission Apollo 11. They both say that the signal came from space, but not from the moon. Shots that have been presented to the public as live broadcasting, were always in very poor quality and black and white. The television took over this event from the projection screen in the presentation room NASA. So it was never a direct connection to television. It was the most important event for humanity. Yet people saw blurred black and white images. Some witnesses claim that live broadcasting dropped out several times.

There are thousands of photographs and kilometers of film strip from all Apollo missions. A large amount of audiovisual recording was to be made during the Apollo missions. Nevertheless, very little of what was gained during the missions was presented to the public. Note that there are a very limited number of photographs that are repeatedly presented to the public. They always look exaggeratedly artistic and perfect. While this doesn't explicitly undermine their credibility, has anyone ever seen the movies and photos they always talk about? Apparently not. Around 2001, NASA ordered all audiovisual material from these missions to be shredded. Who will destroy the most important evidence of such an important path and especially why? I think one of the reasons may be the fear that someone might come to the archives and ask annoying questions. Today's digital technologies can also reveal what should have been hidden in the analog world. I showed that there is some truth in this in a four-part series.

Anyone can verify that artifacts remain on the moon after the landing. Just look through the telescope. I don't know of a single photograph taken from Earth where it would be very clear to see anything one left on the moon. There are photographs taken from satellites that performed cartographic processing of the Moon's surface. But the photos are in a very lousy resolution. The claim that this cluster of dots is the American flag and this shame is the base of the lunar module, is quite bold. And photos of the surface Months na moon.google.com from the landing sites are very poor quality and out of focus. At the closest approach, we see the landing site of the A11, but there is nothing that is said to be there. It is only marked with pictograms. Even the way the astronauts went is photographed in a photograph as a gray shadow. And that's a resolution of 3 centimeters on the map versus 10 meters in real life. If nothing else, the rest of the landing module should be clearly visible.

Astronauts are direct witnesses - they were there! Neil Armstrong as the first man on the moon during his existence, he gave only a very small number of interviews. On the other hand, his colleagues are very eloquent. Nevertheless, to the specific question of what it is like, some answer: "I don't remember anymore.". Others admit that it was all different, that we were not told the truth. For example: Gordon Cooper (Gemini), Edgar D. Mitchell (Apollo 14), Brian O'Leary (Mars) and others.

The Moon has been repeatedly sent probes that have taken landing sites and artifacts in place. Today, we have technologies that can read newspapers from the Earth's orbit over their shoulders. Nevertheless, we are not able to provide the public with photographs of the same quality from the Moon's orbit. The last mission to the moon is led by NASA. 2 probes reached the target at the turn of 2011/2012. The objectives of the mission are: surface photography and gravitational field measurements. To date, the mission's official website contains only low-resolution black-and-white photographs above the moon's surface.

The whole affair was under the blur of Russia, with which America had competed. JFK already wanted to conclude a cooperation agreement with Russia on the flight to the moon. Moreover, even the Russians are not saints. In the media, he is considered to be the first person in the Universe Jurij Gagarin. Only today do we learn that it was different. He can be described as the truly first pioneer Vladimir Sergeyevich Ilyushin. And that's not all. Both sides tried to disguise their failures and exaggerate their successes in the media. It is similar with other space agencies that have either sent probes (ESA, India) or humans (China).

So, were we humans really on the moon? Personally, I think they were, but we used covert technology to a much more sophisticated public than dangerous missiles.

Similar articles