The object in the picture was discovered in Turkey under a five-meter layer of clay, at one of the local archaeological sites. The find is stored in a local museum with a note: "Forgery"

It was Zecharia Sitchin who in her book Country Chronicle he talks about his experience. He knew the existence of that subject and went to see him personally. The artifact was placed in the museum depository (not exhibited), whose director denied the existence of the subject. After several hours of persuasion, he pulled him out of the closet, somewhere behind the desk, and pointed it to Sitchin. When Sitchin asked why the subject was not exposed, the following responses were received from the Director: "It's a forgery." 
"How do you know it's a fake?" Sitchin said. "It's a unique piece. Nowhere else exists such a thing, and we cannot exhibit things that are so unique. ” the director of the museum told him. "What if I prove to you that there are a lot of such things, you publish it?" Sitchin asked again. "Well I do not know. It depends on the evidence… We will consider it. ” the director of the museum concluded.

Zecharia Sitchin returned home and sent him a series of pictures of objects that resemble a rocket.

The museum published the subject and stated in the description: "We believe this subject is a forgery. ”

The object was found at an archaeological site together with several clay plates containing cuneiform. No one has ever questioned their authenticity. The shape of the object resembles a modern space shuttle. Its rear part has the obvious shape of three nozzles. In the middle of the ship you can see a seated figure with a broken head.

In Indian tradition we can find references to machines Vimana. Biblical texts Of the Old Testament talking about the gods coming down on Earth for "buzz and smokeThe most famous case describing the construction of a rocket to reach the gods (Anunnaki) in orbit around Earth is the story known as The tower of Babylon.

Graham Hancock says that mankind suffers from a loss of memory. “We lost track of our past. We refuse to accept that there was someone in front of us who did (technologically) much more… ”