Zachary Sitchnin, in his latest book, Chronicles of Anunnak, among others, gives testimony and evidence that Howard Vyse was a cheater - I quote:

I kept reading again [Vyseho] diaries and other information about what was happening in Egypt at that time and Egyptology. I couldn't shake the feeling that the red-painted inscriptions that Vyse had allegedly found in the narrow chambers were also fakes. With the help of behind-the-scenes diplomacy and also with a little luck, I was able to find in the dusty archives of the British Museum in London a testimony in canvas binding that Vyse left there 150 years ago. "You are the first person in more than a hundred years to see it," the curator of the Egyptian department of the museum told me.

The moment I unfolded the folded sheets, it was clear to me that I had found evidence of a hoax. Let me explain this in a nutshell: Knowledge of Egyptian hieroglyphs at the time was not exactly high. Vyse's assistant, a Mr. Hill, who had entered the chambers and painted key cartouches with the royal name with a red brush, spelled CH-UFU in the manner shown in Illustration "I" (see Figure). However, what he wrote or painted was not Khufu, but RA-UFU (see illustration "J" in the picture), so we call in vain the name of RA, the highest Egyptian god. The correct notation is shown in Figure "I"; this is how you will see it on the "inventory stele" when you visit the cairo museum.

I present this evidence, along with others, in my book Stairs to heaven. A few months after the book was published, I received a letter from an engineer living in Pittsburgh. What you're saying about this, wrote, has been known in our family for 150 years! I immediately called him. It turned out that his great-grandfather was a master stonemason whom Vyse had hired to help him in the pyramid with gunpowder, and that he had written home the night Mr. Hill went to the pyramid with a brush and paint and committed the scam. After 150 years, a witness appeared to confirm my findings ...

[Hr]

This is where the story might actually end. Witness found and evidence as well. Mr. Sitchin solved the mystery of the inscription in the relief chamber. Or not?

The question is: What is actually written today in Wikipedia? What is the correct entry of the name "Chufu"?

Wikipedia: The Chufu Cartridge

So we agree with what Sitchin mentions as Hill's intention to write. Indeed, this also corresponds to what is stated on the above inventory stars. The following picture is a piece of her text where you can see exactly the same cartouche.

Kartuš Chufu for inventory stars (text quote)

So what is actually drawn in the so-called relief chamber of the Great Pyramid, thanks to which this whole theater takes place?

No moment! Looks like Zachary Sitchin must have made a mistake ?! After all, the photo shows a circle with three commas.

Now it would be useful for us to see what Mr Sitchin saw in the British Museum. Unfortunately, I don't have such a photo, but I still want to ask you to once again focus your eyes on the previous pictures and watch every little detail closely. It's like that child's game - find two differences ...

How many horizontal bars inside the wheel have Vyse's glyph version? There are three. How many bars are on the inventory star (and I assume it in wikipedia)? There are four commas.

Detail of Vyse / Hill's glyph

This in itself is a spelling mistake. In the time of the pharaohs, the profession of scribe was a highly prestigious position and to make a spelling mistake in the name of the reigning monarch - rather not know what the punishment would be.

But I wrote, "find two differences." Where is the other one? What did Sitchin see in the British Museum? He wrote that he saw a cartouche where the first character represented a dot in a circle - a symbol of the god RA.

Kartus: Ra-ufu

Do you already see it in the detailed section? The middle line of the three lines is drawn just below the lower half of the dot.

What does it mean? As evidenced by Sitchin's witness, the original inscription created by Mr. Hill was "RA-UFU". Someone had to make mistakes later and notice the symbol. Luckily, for us, this role was taken over by someone who was not a competent writer, because he did not hit and the original dot did not lock the middle dot completely.

RW Howard Vyse

I can imagine the stubbornness with which the mysterious Mr. X took on his role. He had a difficult task ahead of him. To disguise what the Vyse / Hill tandem messed up. If you were to draw four horizontal lines, the dot would remain in the middle without at least partial coverage. However, the current situation shows a similar situation as when a small child tries to draw a snail with a shell in the middle. There's a hump.

In fact, it might be perfectly easy to drive that imaginary last nail into the coffin of Vyse / Hill's deception. It would be enough to open the same diary that Zachary Sitchin had the opportunity to see years ago. However, I am afraid that after this cardinal revelation, which Mr Sitchin has actually made, there will be no evidence.

If someone was so inconsistent in the Great Pyramid, then it is quite likely that it is important that Vyse's diary remains stored deep enough in the archives without the correct inventory number. This would not be the first time that key pieces of evidence in our history have been established in wrong drawer - they can not be found.

However, the body of testimony and available evidence, in my opinion, still clearly shows that the Vyse / Hill lords lied and based their lies in their continued existence in history. Not to mention that they contributed to a rather distorted conception of Egyptian history. What's more, a third person made sure their fraud wasn't so easily detected. And that comes as an even stronger problem - someone else is interested in having the truth suppressed…

[Hr]

[last update]

We have been working on the topic of a fake cartridge several times. An example is an article Scammers in the history of archeology, or how a hundred times repeated lie can become true. Kartuši Richard William Howard Vyse in 2014, the team studied German archaeologists, which subsequently challenged the official date of the Great Pyramid, based on the age of the cartridge. This finding was subsequently rejected by the Egyptian authorities, with the fact that the archaeological team concerned had no permission to do so from the Egyptian authorities.

 Uploading ...