The Glyphs of Gosford is a group of approximately 300 Egyptian hieroglyphs located in an area known as the Aboriginal petroglyphs (West Coast of present-day Australia). The inscriptions are located on two parallel opposite sandstone walls, which are approximately 15 meters high.

On the walls we can see symbols that look like ships, chickens, dogs, upright people, dog bones and two names of kings, only one of which can be interpreted as Khufu (Cheops). There is also an inscription designating the Egyptian god Anubis (god of the underworld).

The text was discovered in 1975 by Alan Dash, who researched the area for over seven years. Professor Ocking claims that there are many reasons why these hieroglyphs are not considered authentic. As a reason: There is a problem with the shapes of the symbols that have been used. They do not correspond to what was known at the time of Cheops around 2500 BC Rather, he believes that the texts may have been written in 1920 by Australian soldiers who served in Egypt. Australian professor of Egyptology Naguib Kanawati also believes that the inscriptions are not authentic and says that the hieroglyphs used in the place come from very distant periods of Egypt and some are written upside down.

Yousef Awyan and his friend Mohamed Ibrahim were born in present-day Egypt. Yousef comes from a family where the wisdom of Kemet (the original designation for Egypt) is inherited from generation to generation orally. He can be considered an Egyptian in the true sense of the word. Mohamed Ibrahim is an expert on hieroglyphic texts. Both were involved in an extensive survey of glyphs from Gosford. Muhammad mentions that his analysis of the texts was based on three scientifically recognized sources for the contemporary interpretation of Egyptian hieroglyphs. Plus, in collaboration with Yousef, they used the rich experience of long-term study of texts on the walls of temples and tombs.

The almost three-hour presentation describes in detail the steps that helped both decipher the message left to us by the ancient ancestors. The report has two parts. The first is written about the voyage of a ship that sank off the coast of an unknown country (today's coast of Western Australia). Of the entire crew, very few individuals survived. The second part writes about the journey to the west, which was a term denoting the journey to the underworld (to the afterlife). Yousef and Muhammad state that it was probably an attempt to formulate a funeral text as dead, as was the custom in the Egyptian tradition of the time.

As for the date on which the accident occurred, they mention the cartouche of Pharaoh Khufu. However, they point out that it would be very unfortunate to automatically declare that the incident took place during the reign of Khufu (around 2600 BC), which corresponds to the 4th dynasty, as the name Khufu was commonly used as early as the 26th dynasty - long before reign of Pharaoh Khufu. They also point out that the 5 cm ivory statue of Khufu alone cannot be, according to Yousef, an authentic depiction of the ruler of the 4th dynasty, as it was found in a tomb from Abydos dating back to the 26th dynasty.

Muhammad further refutes the erroneous conclusions of the Australian Egyptian conspirators. On the contrary, he points out that the writer had to be native speakers (expert in writing), because he used (simply put) dialectical forms of writing that are not found in 20th century textbooks. (The text was to be falsified around 1920.)

Yousef and Mohamed also point out that the text was written from the floor, so to speak, without prior preparation. Symbols are not written in continuous rows or columns, as is customary in Egyptian texts. If it were a modern plagiarism, the author would be based on a template and would therefore have a clear vision in advance of what he will write. He would try to imitate the form (style) of commonly known texts, which is not the case.