In the Gospel of Peter, he says that the Romans are surprisingly likeable individuals and that Jesus did not suffer at all on the cross. The most important difference from the well-established interpretation is how he - as a direct witness to the event - describes the course of the process of resurrection itself.

His interpretation is unique, because all the present Bibles speak only of the result, not of the process itself. So the official version says: the tomb was empty, but they do not even mention the event itself.

Peter's narration begins with 3. the morning of Jesus' death when the Roman soldiers guard the tomb of the fallen Messiah.

The tomb opened, and the soldiers saw it as they kept watch. And as they tried to explain what they had actually seen, they saw three men coming out of the tomb.

Two men supported the third in the middle. Probably Jesus. Then came a deep voice:

• They preached. Did you preach to those who are asleep?
• Year

The resurrection ends with direct witnesses watching the three beings ascend to heaven like a cloud of light (glow). The gospel then ends with a sentence in the sense of:

This is the testimony of Simon Peter, who was the direct witness.

The age of the text itself is not entirely certain. Official dating falls into 7. century AD. There are other fragments of texts that refer to Peter's authorship. However, their age is determined until 500 CE, so its direct authorship seems unlikely.

In 2006, a text called the Gospel of Judas was published. It is not an officially recognized text, as it contains passages that say that Judas was persuaded by Jesus to bring the Romans. In it, Jesus claims that Judas is the wisest of all the apostles because he is enlightened. Judas is the only one who truly understands the essence of Jesus.

In the Gospel of Judas, Jesus says that Judas will supply the Romans only with his physical body. He himself escapes the crucifixion and returns to the kingdom of the spirit. Some deduce from this that the text has Gnostic roots. According to the age of the papyrus, the document ranks in the period around 280 CE. So again, this is not a direct testimony of Judas.

It is clear from both texts that there was and still is an ideological contradiction between how some historical (?) Events are to be understood. Today's Bible is a compilation of texts approved by Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE. It is therefore a politically correct text due to its time.

 Uploading ...

YouTube Live Streaming 12.6.2019 20: 30

We cordially invite you to a live broadcast. There are historical, philosophical and theological discussions about the nature of Jesus. Whether the real character was a historical figure, or whether a historical myth composed of a series of stories attributed to a fictional character…