Giza: The third pyramid contained the mummy

02. 07. 2022
6th international conference of exopolitics, history and spirituality

It is said that no mummified body has survived in any of the pyramids, so claiming that the pyramids serve as tombs is quite misleading, for there is no clear evidence. There are several of the story mummywhich were apparently found in the pyramids. But the problem is in their timing. Official archeology places the origin of the pyramids in Giza in the period of 2000 BC, but the mummy found in the third is somewhat younger:

"In 1837, British Colonel Howard Vyse discovered a basalt sarcophagus in the third - smallest pyramid (the so-called Menkaure). The age of the wooden coffin dates back to the 26th dystonia (664 - 525 BC). However, according to the radiocarbon method, the remains themselves showed a time interval around the Coptic period, ie 30 BC to 732 AD, which is much later than the reign of Menkaure, which dates back to the Old Kingdom (about 2600 BC). "

So the chaos in dating is absolutely perfect! So which of the time determinations best affects reality? Or, conversely, what does it tell us?

If we were to follow the least resistance, we could say this: In the 7th century AD, they buried person X in a wooden coffin from the 6th century BC in a pyramid more than 4600 years old. Another interpretation is offered. If the pyramids functioned as an ancient technology used, among other things, to travel to stars our ancestors could send the deceased on the last interstellar voyage, with all the proprietary could belong.

So I would conclude that if a pyramid of the old empire still contained a mummy, it was not a person buried at the same time as the pyramid was built. The absolute specifics in this direction are then the remains of the bull to the place of man in the middle pyramid.

 

Inspired: Facebook

Similar articles