This basic interview was conducted in 2006, followed by two additions from 2007, which we will get to later. The interview was conducted with a physicist who wishes to remain anonymous at his request ("Henry Deacon") is a pseudonym. Given that this written version is a processing of the original video report, we had to omit some details so that the identity of this person remains intact. Henry's name is real and we finally managed to verify the details of his job. We met him in person several times. He was, of course, a little nervous at first, but he was interested in talking to us. In conversation, he sometimes responded with silence, a quiet, significant look, or a mysterious smile. However, we must say that he was incredibly calm all the time. In the end, we added a few additional additions to this written version, which resulted from the subsequent mutual e-mail correspondence. One of the very important facts of this material is that Henry confirms the key testimonies of the scientist Dr. Dana Burische. For many, many reasons, this conversation is extremely important for understanding events that may be associated with the near future.

If you want to first read the first part of the conversation - Henry Deacon, part.1

Kerry: Can you tell us about time loops? By the way, can we again ask you if you have heard of Dan Burisch?

Henry: No, I do not remember him. I do not know him.

Kerry: By the way, we talked to him last month. It's next to John Lear on the website.

Henry: I saw your interview with John Lear as he talked about photographs of the lunar surface as these materials are intentionally retouched by NASA. He is a very characteristic person and I would like to meet him in person someday.

A few people also know that radar messages within the National Meteorological Service are also being retouched so that specific radar reflections are not released to the general public. Of course, everything is done electronically using special software that can retouch the resulting product in an incredibly accurate way. I know that a relatively large number of anomalous traces can be detected in this way. In addition, meteorological radar is not able to detect traces of objects that move faster than a few thousand miles per hour, but these traces still occur here and they need to be removed.

Kerry: Ufos?

Henry: Sure. They are often optically invisible, but show up very well on the radar. Sometimes they are also visible in ultraviolet radiation. I don't think people generally know about it.

Kerry: Okay, but let's go back to those time loops. So what else can you tell us about them?

Henry: OK (long pause). The situation with time loops seems to be that there are a large number of parallel branches that intertwine differently. If you hypothetically go back in time to kill your grandfather, many will tell you that this is a paradox, because you could never be born. But we know that this is not really a paradox at all. If you go back in time and, God forbid, kill your grandfather, you will change the past and create a new parallel branch of the event timeline that will be parallel to the original one.

You will simply not be born in this new line, so you will never exist in this line. But you still exist on the original line, you are here and you live on. So some paradox. If you look at a diagram of what I'm saying, you'll see something we call a "tree of time." No principles are violated. All future events are possible, not certain. What I am saying now is very, very important. That is all I can tell you on this issue now.

Kerry: Do you have any information about chemtrails?

Henry: Of course. What is generally called "chemtrails" was developed by scientist Edward Teller. In the beginning, it was a matter of releasing thousands of tons of aluminum microparticles into the upper atmosphere in an effort to increase the planet's albedo, the planet's reflectivity in connection with the issue of global warming. Microparticles of gold, real gold, were once used on another planet. But they really had a lot of gold. We have basically adopted this method. Only gold was replaced by aluminum.

I know that there is now a great deal of controversy over the phenomenon of global warming. I can tell you that the situation is very confusing and certainly not easy. But global warming is real. Indeed, it is only partially caused by the so-called 'greenhouse effect'. However, clearly the primary cause, and this makes the situation considerably worse, is significantly increased solar activity. Solar activity is really a big problem.

Kerry: Why is not this information known to everyone? I think they should know about such things. I do not think there would be any threatened security. If what you say is really true?

Henry: From a scientific point of view, this is a huge hazard. I don't quite understand the whole process. It can easily make things worse than it has been so far. There can certainly be side effects in the area of ​​health, but also in the area of ​​the global climate. As a result, it can affect the entire planet. You have a one-sided undemocratic decision very far from normal, which is part of what a great technological project that essentially affects everyone on this planet. I don't know if it really is. I just guess. Everything is shrouded in great mystery.

Kerry: Who's behind it?

Henry: I do not know.

Kerry: Is it somehow connected with the proclaimed weather wars?

Henry: (Pause). Yes there are weather wars. Personally, I am convinced that the army will have very powerful tools for influencing the weather within two years.

Kerry: What else can you tell us?

Henry: Read "The Report form Iron Mountain". There is a lot of truth in that text. I was working with a group down there ?? .. Then they gave us a message, The strange thing was that it had nothing to do with what we were working on. Then one man, who in some way was behind the written report about which, but I can't say anything more, told us something like this: "They are wolves and sheep. And we are the wolves. Then he urged us to study the report carefully. You know, they're just solving a problem with the fact that there are just a lot of people on this planet. They are planning various solutions to this problem. So far, I have more or less talked about various space-time problems, but the real problem is the overpopulation of this planet. There are various problems in reducing the global population. Believe it or not, the intention is positive. In fact, it was never a problem of the planet as such. The planet itself has been, is and will be here. It has always been a problem of lonely humanity.

Kerry: So you are really convinced that there is depopulation in the game?

Henry: Basically yes. At present, there are many means which are elusive to a normal person and which could be very effective in this respect. Unfortunately?..

Kerry: All right, but what do you personally think about it?

Henry: It's hard. (Pause). I'm really horrified. However, as a scientist who is looking at things from a vantage point, I point out, from a great vantage point, I must say that to some extent I understand such a way of thinking. Try to understand that I am not trying to defend this philosophy in any way. It is a commentary from an abstract scientific point of view. This is a cardinal ethical issue. Unfortunately, humanity faces incredibly fundamental energy problems in the widest range of implications. Due to the nature of my work, I had the opportunity to look at this problem from many angles.

By the way, do you know that it is entirely legal to test biological and chemical instruments in society? Again, I repeat that this is quite legal. However, when you ask the mayor or any other senior official at the district or regional level, then you will find that these people have no idea of ​​the big and key issues. Think about it.

Kerry: During our conversation, you revealed a lot of often hardly believable material. So, before we finish our interview, let me ask, "What is the most important information you would like to share with people?"

Henry: Look, I don't want to shock anyone. I support every human optimistic mind. However, if I take into account everything I have encountered and what I have seen, if I take into account all the information and facts behind it, then I have a big personal problem. I have a big problem being optimistic. In fact, the problems facing our human race on this planet are enormous.

I do not believe that the majority of the civilian population is ready to fully understand these problems, to accept them as a reality and to face them. People have a lot of trouble managing their daily lives and these problems are on a completely different level. In fact (as I indicated earlier), overcrowding is a critical factor for immediate resolution. Everything else is directly related to this.

Quite simply and naively speaking, the army can practically take the fate of humanity into its own hands from day to day. The moment if all problems and all possible proposals for their solution were fully revealed to humanity, do you think that would help any of us? I have to say for myself that probably not. It would only create more complications. But somewhere deep down, I feel that everyone should be familiar with these facts. If I had thought otherwise, I would not have entered into this conversation.

So the most important information I would like to say goodbye to you is that despite all my objective doubts, I feel hope. The hope that, as humanity, the beautiful blue planets will succeed in solving all this successfully. Humanity is facing the end of childhood. If we successfully manage the following years of our civilization, we will show the whole universe that we have matured - that we have grown up. And then we'll see what's next ??

This is how the conversation with Henry Deacon ended. He was followed by lively correspondence, which provided insight into many important topics. We will bring you a summary of information on individual topics in the continuation of this series. In a week again.