Inappropriate artifact: a container that is 500 for millions of years?

2 22. 11. 2023
6th international conference of exopolitics, history and spirituality

Inappropriate artifact is a technical name that designates dozens of prehistoric objects found in various places around the world. These objects point to a level of technology that does not correspond to the time when they were created. Inappropriate artifacts it often embarrasses conservative scientists and captivates adventurous researchers and enthusiastic debaters, open to alternative theories.

After firing a rock in Dorchester, Massachusetts (USA) in 1882, a metal container was found. Her discovery raised questions: how the object found itself in a rock that was more than 500 million years old, and whether it really was inside the rock.

An article in the Scientific American magazine of June 5, 1852 quotes the Boston Transcript: "This strange and unknown vessel was removed from solid rock, 15 feet below the surface." There is no doubt that this object was in a rock "(see full article below) . The mentioned rock was formed during the Neoproterozoic period, ie 541 million to a billion years ago.

The statement is criticized by the Bad Archeology website, which claims that the vessel was unlikely to have been placed in a rock, and its finders only assumed this after seeing it at the site of the explosion. The website states that it resembles recent artifacts.

It is not clear why the people who found the object were so sure that it was inside a rock, but there seemed to be no doubt about it at the time.

Scientific American describes the subject as follows: "an ancient metal vessel, possibly made by Tubal-Kain, the first inhabitant of Dorchester." Tubal-Cain was the blacksmith of legend and a descendant of the biblical figure of Cain. Did the author from Scientific American joke about the strange statement that the artifact could be so old, or portray a mystery with humor?

Many "inappropriate artifacts" resemble current inventions or objects. Some claim that the artifacts are in fact from the present, and it just seems that they appeared from ancient times. Others believe that human civilization has flourished and been destroyed several times in earth's history, while always creating similar cultures.

Article Scientific American:

A few days ago, a blasting of Meeting House Hill in Dorchester, several rods (length = 5 meters) south of the Rev. Mr. Hall's. The blast ejected huge chunks of rock, some several tons, and scattered small fragments in all directions. Among them was a metal object that broke the explosion in two. When joined, they obtained a bell-shaped container 4,5 inches high, 6,5 inches in diameter at the bottom, and 2,5 inches at the top of the object.

The color is similar to zinc and metal, which contains a large proportion of silver. There are six flowers and flowers depicted on the sides, magnificently incrustated with pure silver, the lower part is engraved with grapevine, also inlaid with silver. Engraving, engraving and incrustation are gently executed by a master craftsman.

This strange and unknown vessel was removed from solid rocky rock, 15 feet below the surface. It is now owned by Mr. John Kettell. Dr. JVCSmith, who had recently returned from a trip to the Orient, where he examined hundreds of unusual handicrafts and documented them with drawings, had never seen anything like it.

He drew a vessel and measured it accurately for further scientific research. There is no doubt that this strange object was thrown from a rock, as written above. But will Professor Agassiz or any other scientist want to explain to us how he got there? An issue that is worth exploring, because in this case it is not a fraud.

The aforementioned is taken from the Boston Transcript, assuming Transcript's assumption that Professor Agassiz will be able to better explain how the subject appeared here than John Doyle, a blacksmith. This is not a matter of zoology, botany or geology, but it is a problem associated with an ancient metal can, possibly made by Tubal-Cain, the first inhabitant of Dorchester.

Similarly, there are more inappropriate findings. Are they authentic?

View Results

Uploading ... Uploading ...

Similar articles