A group of photographers discovered prints in stone on August 24.08.2017, 60, said the Chinese news agency Sina. Traces have been found in southwest China, in Guizhou Province near the village of Ping-yen. One of them is well defined, the other does not have clear outlines. The soft rock in which the imprints were found had long since hardened. The footprints look human and are about 4 centimeters long. The one who left them here was 6 to XNUMX meters high.

Finds of similar footprints are on the rise, which could support the theory that giants once lived on Earth, or at least people who were taller than us. The most famous of these finds was discovered by a South African farmer, Stoffel Koetz in the Transvaal, 1,28 m long and 0,6 m wide: The trail of God in Africa

ARGUMENTS PRO: 40 meter Adam and 35 meter Eva
It is quite difficult to find a nation that does not have legends and rumors about giants. But we don't have to go that far, just look at the Bible: "at that time giants lived on earth, from the time when the sons of God began to come to the daughters of men and they began to give birth." Elsewhere in the Bible, there is a report of the scouts that Moses sent to Palestine: "We saw giants of the giant family there, and we were like locusts compared to them." If we took this statement literally, we would reach a height of about 50 meters. .

Mentions of giants are also found in the Qur'an - it is written about the giants that they were taller than the tallest palm trees, and Noah mocked that the flood would not harm them because they were tall enough.

It is remarkable that the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus, who created a system of biological classification of plants and animals, was convinced of the truth of these claims. And Linnaeus was convinced that Adam and Eve were 40 and 35 meters tall.

Written testimony
"The bodies were huge and the faces were so different from the human ones that looking at them was very strange and unpleasant, and hearing their voices was frightening," say the giant myths, but the living historian and scholar Flavius ​​Iosephus. His colleague Pausanias, who lived in the 2nd century AD, tells the story that a well-preserved skeleton of a man more than five meters tall was discovered in Syria.

According to the notes of the Arab diplomat and traveler Ahmad ibn Fadlān (turn of the 9th and 10th centuries AD), the subjects of the Khazar khan showed him a 6-meter skeleton. Remains of similar dimensions were seen in a museum in Lucerne, Switzerland, by Russian writers Turgenev and Korolenko. They were told that this unusually large skeleton was discovered in 1577 in a mountain cave by the doctor Felix Platner.

In Russian annals, it is recorded that in the battle of Kulikov's field in 1380, the Golden Horde also erected a giant about four meters high against the army of Prince Dmitry Donsky. A group of Russian heroes, led by Rodion Osljably, defeated him, and it is possible that the last descendant of the giants died 626 years ago.

But four to six meters were not among the tallest. The Spanish conquerors of the Aztec Empire discovered a skeleton 20 meters high in one of the temples and sent it as a gift to the Pope. In the 19th century, the American scientist Josiah Dwight Whitney examined a skull with a diameter of two meters. It was found in one of the shafts in the state of Ohio, and if we calculate it, we will reach the height of this creature about 50 meters, which brings us back to the contemporaries of Noah before the flood.

Should we not believe in ancient chronicles? It looks like the giants really existed ...

ARGUMENTS AGAINST: Teeth that belong to monkeys
Adherents of the giants make other arguments, one of them are the so-called cyclops. The most interesting are probably the Baalbek terraces in Lebanon, about 100 kilometers from today's Beirut. Archaeologists have discovered monolithic blocks measuring 21 x 5 x 4 meters in their foundations. Some of them weigh up to 800 tons. But they are assembled so precisely that you can't even insert a needle between them. Did the giants build it?

Skeptics argue that while it is not possible to clarify how the 800-ton monoliths were stored, it is nonsense to assume that they were handled by 20-40 meter people. Even with such an increase, there would have to be at least six of them, and such an individual could not lift more than 100 tons.

Another skeptical theory is that the imprints of giants only resemble humans, and there is no evidence that they have anything to do with man. And it is with the Chinese footprint that the position of the thumb relative to the foot is somewhat special.

Skeletons that are larger than ours are not exhibited in any of the museums in the world. All photos on the internet are forgeries that were originally created as part of an audition Archaeological Anomalies 2, the beginning of our century and some artists they continue to do so to this day. The original task of the audition was to create a credible-looking sensational archaeological find.

Nevertheless, we find something huge in the museum, and that is teeth. They look almost human, but they are 6 times bigger than ours. They were for the first time discovered in 1935 by the German paleoanthropologist Gustav von Koenigswald (believe it or not) in one of Hong Kong's pharmacies. According to estimates, their owner weighed 350-400 kg.

Many proponents of the giants argue with these teeth in favor of the theory of giants who are to be the ancestors of humans. It is known that in 1956, three huge jaws with similar teeth were found in southern China, Guangxi Province. However, it was determined that they belonged to large apes - gigantopiths, almost four meters high primates, and not humans.

Maybe even in China, a huge ape left his footprints, the size of the footsteps would correspond to the giganopite…