On 11.X.2012 I enjoyed my own a few seconds of glory on CT24. The editor almost overcame me (thinking and preparing for less than an hour) and promised an unfinished 6 minute interview. I hesitated very much, I know how it goes, and finally I agreed mainly because I saw it as an opportunity to at least briefly present a different opinion. Because of the flu and vaccination against her every year we hear the same thing. Finally, it has been shown that the ability to equally present opposing views is not yet sufficiently developed in our mainstream media. The minister and vaccinationologist got about 10 minutes each, making me a few sentences.

That's why I use the internet and written form to get among the people what I wanted to say.

For readers not yet familiar with the issues of vaccination, my views will be extreme. I would point out beforehand that, to all that I say, unlike vaccine supporters, I have scientific evidence. Many times in history it has turned out that the prevailing opinion is not right. We do not have to go far, just go back to 50. years of the last century, when doctors promoted cigarettes, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCMzjJjuxQI. Less than 200 years ago, doctors did not wash their hands before surgery. At the beginning of every progress, there is often only one person who thinks and sees differently. I am not the only one, I belong to the minority of doctors and scientists who are beginning to doubt vaccination. Of course, they taught me something else in medicine, they taught me what the proponents of the official line are saying on television today. Thanks to negative personal experiences, I had to come to a different opinion and it was not an easy journey.

So why not get sick with flu. Let's look first at the vaccination and then on the flu as a disease.

1. In particular, it has not been sufficiently demonstrated that the effectiveness of vaccination would be such as to offset its risks. Metaanalysis of various influenza vaccination studies^[1] showed that the efficiency is around 60%. We need to break this figure to see real efficiency for individuals. The risk of infection and its change after vaccination should be compared. The risk of true influenza infection in an epidemic is approximately 3% for unvaccinated individuals. In this study, they found that the vaccine had a risk of about 1,4%. Dividing these two numbers to 60%.
   If 3% and 1,4% are reduced to 80%, it means that XNUMX people need to be vaccinated to protect one from influenza. Otherwise, this is also called number need to treat (NNT) - the number of people who need to be treated to help one.
   It does not look too impressive, does it? Vaccinations will reduce your personal risk from 3% to just 1,4%, but at the same time you have 100% sure that the vaccine will drown in you something you do not want. Every recipient of a drug or vaccine is exposed to side effects, no one knows in advance what they will be.
2. Also, it has never been proven based on evidence based medicine that influenza vaccination reduces overall mortality and morbidity. You can be sure that if such a study existed, we would hear about it from television. Even significant fluctuations in influenza vaccination have no effect on mortality.
3. Furthermore, if vaccination protects at all, then only against actual flu. Additionally, the manufacturer must strike when estimating the incoming strains of influenza. When vaccines are given strains that do not occur in the given season, the vaccine effectiveness may be practically zero. Many people get vaccinated against the flu in the false hope that they will not be sick in the winter. They are then surprised that the sick are, and sometimes even more (why, let's say this further). People are confused with common flu viruses. There are more than 200 of different bacteria and viruses that can cause all those winter sicknesses. Clinically, they are similar, the clinical picture can not determine the originator of the disease, whether it is a virus or a bacterium. This is the reason why doctors perform CRP examinations. If you want to be healthy in the winter, you have to take other precautions before getting vaccinated.
4. Undesirable effects (AD) of the vaccination can be really serious. The doubters may read the package leaflet of any influenza vaccine, look at the US VA reporting system https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/index or simply enter the internet search engine "Flu shot adverse effect" or "Guillan Barre Syndrome Flu shot", "CFS flu shot", etc. Get ready for horror reading.
   When reading a leaflet (without reading it, you should not agree with any vaccinations), note the parts of the AD reported in the postmarketing period. It means the NUs that appeared during normal use. Just comparison of the NDs found in clinical trials and in normal use is striking. NUs from studies are practically non-serious, swelling and redness at the site of injection, mild pain, non-serious overall symptoms, etc. In contrast, post-marketing surveillance is a response to disorders such as immune system, angioedema, nervous system disorders, including inflammation of the brain and spinal cord Guillan-Barré (general paralysis, GBS), renal involvement in vasculitis and more. This difference shows that clinical trials prior to the approval of the vaccine are not very thorough.
   The first recorded increase in GBS was reported in 1976, when the first hysteria around the swine flu originated in the US and a massive vaccination campaign took place. Scientists do not yet know what GBS causes after vaccination, so this risk is realistic even with current vaccines. Although Guillan-Barré syndrome is reported to affect only one person per million after vaccination, it is possible that the incidence is higher. Only suspected cases will occur in the reporting system. If neither the patient nor the physician thinks that the problems are related to the vaccination, they do not even log them. Official estimates indicate that 1-10% of the actual occurring NUs appear in the NU vaccination reporting systems. Therefore, all numbers you see in the system must be multiplied by at least 10x. Personally, my NF flu vaccine spectrum is quite scary. Most of all, I'm afraid of their unpredictability. None of the people who suffered NIs after the vaccination had any reason to think that they should be victims.
5. Recent research shows that vaccination against one strain of influenza can increase susceptibility to another strain of influenza. Specifically, this occurred in the swine flu season, when seasonal influenza individuals were at higher risk of pandemic influenza than unvaccinated individuals. This finding is in stark contrast to the claims made by our vaccinationists that seasonal influenza vaccination protects against pandemics. This statement calmed our public at the time of peak hysteria around swine flu, when it seemed that the vaccine would not be enough. It turns out the opposite is true.
   The mechanism that can be explained is the so-called primary antigenic sin. It is artificially induced antigen tolerance. When pre-formed antibodies bind to a complex particle (a virus or a bacterium), they act opposite to suppress the immune response. They prevent unnecessary bleeding of antibody formation after they have reached a sufficient level. But if already existing antibodies (eg from previous vaccination) cross-react, but do not completely sit on the antigen, then they have low affinity for the new antigen. Antibodies will suppress the immune response and allow the disease to spread freely. I repeat: the real role of antibodies is very likely to suppress the immune response, not to ensure it! It seems that the whole theory of vaccination is on the wrong assumption.

Although we are afraid of the flu as if threatening everyone, the reality is that the likelihood of getting sick, how serious the disease is, and whether we heal or die determines many factors that vaccineologists do not even take into account. They just want to inoculate everyone to protect it. Although the vast majority of people do not have to worry about the flu.
       But you need to know how to protect yourself and how to treat it. Not every virosis is flu. People come to a clinic with banal viroses and they say "I have a flu". They do not. If they had it, they would probably never have come to the surgery. The flu will surprise you suddenly, you may be leaving your work in full health and in an hour you are chucked in a fever bed around 40 ° C. Influenza is practically impossible to cross. It will literally ground you. One has a problem getting to the toilet. And if you try to get through it, you are really playing with life. Mortality statistics are nonsense if they can not be read about the sick. Because the risk of illness and / or death from influenza differs from an individual to an individual, from practically 0% to almost 100%. So what do you do to reduce the risk of influenza (and other viruses) getting and how to treat it to increase your chances of quick recovery?

• Do not pass the disease. In the long run, it pays off richly to stay in bed for the first few days. Illness is never good, don't solve what you can't do. The flu is difficult to get through, it is really bad for a person, but some uninitiated people tune in to medicines and set out to build capitalism. Do not do this, you could die or you could be very injured.
• Do not drop the fever if you have it. You have a fever because you need it, your body produces it and makes it as high as necessary. Fever enhances the immune system's activity and makes your body inhospitable to viruses and bacteria. Especially do not use paracetamol (Paralen, Coldrex to name the most famous products). The mechanism of use of paracetamol is such that it reduces the immune response. Paracetamol has no effect on viruses or bacteria, which is still the same in your body, just by turning off your defense. Studies confirm that the use of drugs for fever prolongs the disease, increases the risk of complications and death.^[2][3] It's logical, and I do not understand why they need to do a study. It results from its mechanism of action that every doctor should know. I do not see why doctors routinely recommend to patients a medication that will reduce their healing chances and even increase the risk of death.
  In the light of these findings, the statistics on mortality on influenza in seniors should be evaluated. Elderly people generally eat poorly, have weaker immunity and tend to take medication. Paracetamol for flu can be a real nail in the coffin. Because I forbid paracetamol my patients, I have the opportunity to compare the progression of illness among those who do not take it with those who take it (before I explain). I have never seen such a tired fatigue and exhaustion in a man after a flu that did not shake the temperature. I personally had a flu in my life several times, always feverish to 40 ° C, it was not a bit pleasant but within a week after the temperature drop I was fit. All patients who had been tired for weeks or months after flu or tired of exhaustion were people who had been paralyzed "To be Healthy". They flashed an ad that does not lie - look at it well. Advertising on Coldrex does not say the word about the effect on the infection, nor the word about healing, he says openly - suppressing the symptoms of the flu. Nothing more. The problem is that a common uneducated person does not know what suppression actually means and what he does.
• Use the means to boost immunity. These remedies should be used preventively, not only for illness.
• Healthy food. The vast majority of the population (about 90%) has a lack of vitamins and antioxidants. I know because I'm measuring it if anyone doubts she can watch this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX4oxxGWi_8. There are a number of these substances in the body: lycopene, carotenoids, lutein, zeaxanthin and others. Everything is the stuff we normally eat (or should) in the diet. If you eat enough vegetables and fruits containing these substances, you automatically get vitamin C. The results are very similar to what Dr. Oz. To be immune to diseases, consume at least 600g vegetables daily and 3 pieces of fruit. You can even more, the ideal thing is that vegetables make 50-70% of everything you eat. Reduce sugar, soothe immunity. Eat fresh, high-quality food, do not heat pre-cooked food in microwaves, reduce additives, chemistry, etc. Eat acidic cabbage, a good source of vitamin C and also probiotics that have a positive effect on immunity.
• Highly effective against flu is vitamin D. We also have little to do with it. I measured about 100 patients at the end of the winter and the normal level was only 3. I.e. 3%. Even those who had been at sea earlier in the summer had low values. Vitamin D stocks last up to a maximum of 3 moons, which may be one of the reasons why flu epidemics are most likely to come after Christmas. Vitamin D can be easily supplemented as nutritional supplements or as fish oil. Unlike vaccination, it protects you against all infectious diseases, not just flu, it protects you from cancer and other illnesses, has no side effects, it is difficult to overdose it. Safe doses are considered to be around 5.000 IU for adults. The infant receives 500 IU during the first year of life, which corresponds to 5.000 - 10.000 IU for an adult.
• When you go to a pharmacy for some medicines, you have to know what to ask for. If you want something "On influenza", very likely they will offer you Coldrex or something similar. The reasons are simple. The pharmacy sells medication and wants to make money on it. He will earn more on Coldrex than on a simple paralell that would make you the same "Service" for one tenth of the price, he earns more than homeopathic and herbal tea.
  So ask for something to support immunity to infections. There are many possibilities: homeopathy, from regular Oscillococcin to individually selected medicines, echinacea in various forms, megadoses of vitamin C (at least 5 g per day, ideally up to 10 g per day (to a dose that starts to cause you diarrhea, then take lightly), vitamin D , beta-glucans, bacterial lysates (Preventan, GS Imunostim, etc.) All of these agents will help you fight infection, they will not trip your legs like paracetamol.It will not be as good for you as after paracetamol, but you will recover faster and you will not suffer after recovery protracted fatigue.

Opinions in favor of vaccination are nowadays in the media. You know them. I have given you a different view of why it is better not to wait and see how to deal with the illness. Compare this, judge the scientific evidence, evaluate the risk for yourself. Then decide yourself.

Sources:

[1] Osterholm MT et al, Efficacy and effectiviness of influenza vaccines: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lancet infect dis, 2012, 12 (1), 36-44
[2] Ahmady AS, Samadi AR, The adverse effects of antipyretics in measles, Indian Pediatr, 1981, 18: 49-52
[3] Witsenburg BC, Measles mortality and therapy, Journal of Anthroposophical Medicine, 1987, 4 (1): 26-27

Source: Freedom