After six months of research by senior scientists at Stanford University, the Atacama humanoid remains a great mystery.

Humanoid was first discovered in 2003 in the distant Atamacama desert located in Chile (the eastern coast of South America), but I did not know about it until 2009 when I was invited to explore as a mummy-looking humanoid creature in Barcelona ). In the summer of 2012, Ramón Navia-Osrio Villar, president of the Instituto de Investigaciones y Estudios Exobiológicos, kindly allowed our team to do more tests on the humanoid.

We flew to Barcelona (Spain) in the second half of October 2012 with the intention of obtaining detailed regent images, CT (CT) and genetic material samples for further testing at Standford University.

Dr. Garry Nolan (Professor Rachford and Carlot A. Harris at the Stanford University Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine) led our team investigating a humanoid being. He was the one who designed the protocol for DNA sampling and in collaboration with Dr. Raple Lachman (also from Stanford University) has accurately designed which X-ray imaging and CT should be done to properly evaluate skeletal anomalies.

Dr. Lachman is a visiting and visiting professor at Stanford University and author of "Syndrome Investigation, Metabolism and Bone Dysplasia," and is the world's largest expert in skeletal dysplasia and abnormalities. He was again the one who examined X-rays, CT and humanoid photographs.

We have obtained very good DNA samples by surgically removing the ends of two right front humanoid ribs. The sample microscope clearly contained bone marrow. These were passed for further investigation. Bone marrow and other skull material were collected under sterilized conditions and placed directly into sterilized containers provided by Dr. Nolan.

According to the documentation forensics, this evidence was subsequently personally delivered to me by Dr. Nolan to Washington in October 2012.

Atacama Humanoid has a 13 centimeter (or 6 inches) long body that is very dry but completely intact. CT has clearly shown us internal thoracic organs  (lungs and something that looks like a heart remnant). There is no doubt that it is a real organism, and that it is not a whip in any direction. This fact was confirmed by Dr. Nolanem and Dr. Lachman of Standford.

The exemplar has only 10 ribs, which does not occur in humans, and a very unusual skull. It should be noted that the cranial bones are much larger in relation to humans. The bones are very well developed and not like the human fetus (see figures below). Several skeletal anomalies can be observed in the specimens. We can see a clearly mature (not prenatal) tooth in the lower jaw (jawbone). Furthermore, the fracture of the right humerus (upper arm) can be seen as a concave fracture of the right back side of the skull, which was most likely the cause of death.

Dr. Lachman has come to the conclusion that the appearance of the humanoid is not as a result of any known deformity, genetic defect, skeletal dysplasia or any other known human abnormality. However, the most striking conclusion at the moment was that Dr. Lachman stated that the humanoid lived for 6 to 8 years. (Cell report Dr. Lachman in English.) Age was determined by examining the epiphyseal disc in the knees and comparing with normal human epiphyses of different ages.

 

He also noted that there was no known human form of dwarfism that would arise from the examined set of findings.

It should also be noted that Dr. Manchon, a Manchon Radiology Center in Barcelona, ​​also examined X-rays and concluded that the specimen is not a fruit and that he lived for one year or more. Probably several years.

Previously, in various media, there have been good news that the humanoid was a (human) fetus.

This is clearly not the case, as evidenced by the research of Dr. Lachman and the study of Dr. Manchona. If we compare the X-rays of the skeleton of the human fetus and the Atacama humanoid, we see striking differences.

Dr. Nolan conducted a thorough and thorough DNA analysis at Standford University. For this purpose, a high-quality DNA sample was successfully obtained and analyzed.

To date, only a preliminary DNA analysis has been performed. Dr. Nolan notes that this may take a year before the manual analysis is processed and the final conclusions are drawn.

Dr. Nolan remarks: “DNA was of high quality. It shows almost no degradation. ”

Dr. Nolan also states that: "Sequence analysis definitely excludes that the sample is a new world primate."

Dr. Nolan said unequivocally: “Preliminary results show no statistically significant changes in gene proteins that could be associated with known genes typical of the early symptoms of Dwarfism or its other firms. If the sample genetic bases examined were a symptom of random mutation (or mutations), then they are not evident at this level of analytical investigation. ”.

It should be noted that the Neanderthals are 99,5% genetically identical to humans and chimpanzees and monkeys from 96% to 97%.

To date, the genotype does not appear to match the phenotype. (Thought as a physically expressed form of genetics.)

The answer to this mystery will lead to further DNA analyzes and the need to review the results through peer review.

Report by Dr. Nolana notes that further research is needed:

This preliminary report shows how biomedical technologies currently available can be easily used to analyze archeologically and anthropologically relevant human samples with genetic disorders of unknown origin.
This report is not a formal conclusion on the nature of the mutations or underlying cause of the disorder in this humanoid sample. At present, the data obtained (conservatively) represent only a 15-fold reading of the whole genome and as such is insufficient for final conclusions. Future plans include continuing to study this sample with the intent to perform up to 50-fold WHS reading that could point to targeted sequences of hypothetical causal mutations. It is also planned to compare the observed sequence changes against the recently developed ethnically oriented genomic database. Full DNA analysis, and efforts to link to genetics of morphology, will eventually be followed by peer-reviewed articles in an accredited scientific journal. The results shall be independently verified before their publication. '.

From a clinical point of view, this humanoid lived decades to centuries (the exact date is not known, but it is probably not the last living specimen). It's hard to understand how a 13 centimeter big baby or baby could live 6 to 8 years in such a distant and inhospitable part of the world. Even nowadays, with the best possibilities in a neonatal intensive care unit, we would hardly keep such a specimen alive. As a doctor on alert, I encountered premature babies as well as significantly deformed anencephalomas. I am amazed at how this humanoid is fragile.

 

If it is a deformed person, then from a medical point of view, it does not seem likely that he will live to 6 to 8 years of age. As a doctor, and like the other doctors I've talked to about it, I doubt that such a person would live longer than 6 hours. It should also be noted that the sample has well-developed teeth in the mandible, which is not consistent with a human embryo of this size.

Modern medicine lacks information on how a child could live so long in the primitive conditions of the area. And especially with whom? It is certain that there are more questions than answers at this time.

The whole mystery is amplified by reports from Ramon Navio-Osorio Villara and his colleagues, who in the region obtained information from local indigenous peoples who observed ETV and very small living creatures whose description of appearance corresponds to the humanoid under study. We have reports that there are other intact humanoid bodies stored in remote locations of the site [Atacama Desert]. However, these messages are not confirmed.

In this case, much more thorough research is needed. Work on DNA analysis is really in the early stages, and we also need to do a scientific expedition to the Atacama desert to find out if there are other cases of this humanoid and whether UFO / ET activity continues in the area as mentioned.

 

Hypotheses and thoughts

If genetics continue to suggest a link between this humanoid and humans, what does this mean in practice? At present, we cannot say unequivocally that the Atacama Humanoid is an ET alien.

Recently some scientists DNA engineers and computer analysts have found that DNA is more than 10 billion years old. But there is only half the country here. Perhaps life is truly universal and spreads from planet to planet ...

I talked to other scientists about the possibilities of epigenetic spread of the human genome. Is the Atacama Humanoid a so-called hybrid? Are we humans of our own kind of hybrids? Could this have happened through contacts with other extraterrestrial civilizations for millions of years? A source who does not want to be named told me that he saw a document at the Nationa Security Agency stating that there had been 64 epigenetic additions in the past, which had resulted in the emergence of modern man. Is this possible?

One scientist from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) once told me that the reasons why astronaut Buzz Aldrin (Apollo 11) wants to return to and around Mars and explore it are found objects [pyramids, obelisks, tubes, faces, etc. ]. It would turn out that there is an old connection between aliens and humans. And that's why this information is still secret. When I asked why, he said, "Because the foundation of any fundamentalist orthodox belief system on Earth would be terminated."

If you want to research scientifically, you have to strive for the true nature of things. At this moment and in the future, we need an open mind so that together we can discover the truth about many things that are still hidden from us.

Research on a DNA sample is at a very early stage and is incomplete. Much remains. It is a paradox between initial DNA tests that are largely the result of comparing computer databases. In the case of X-ray imaging and CT, this is a comparison with clinical findings. Dr. Lachman concluded that the specimen is 6 years old and only 13 centimeters in height. To date, DNA data on this confusing finding does not provide us with a reasonable explanation. Even if it was a human species, we still have some unidentified DNA that will need to undergo further genetic analysis in collaboration with DNA experts. Inappropriate DNA will have to be carefully examined and it has not been done so far. This is approximately 2 million pairs of DNA bases.

 

Author: Dr. Steven M. Greer
Source: SiriusDisclosure.com