[last update]

Frederic Norden around 1700 in his book Travels in Egypt and Nubia (Travels to Egypt and Nubia) described the four main pyramids on the plateau of Giza. In his book illustration we can see the position of the fourth pyramid. The overall drawing of the three pyramids and the surrounding buildings is very accurate for the time.

He describes the fourth pyramid on page 120 of his book: “The main pyramids at Giza are in the southeast.… There are four that deserve the most attention. Although we see seven or eight others in the area, they are uninteresting compared to these four. The two northernmost pyramids are the largest and are about 152,5 meters in height. The other two are much smaller, but still have some peculiarities that are worth exploring and admiring. ”

The fourth pyramid was the smallest of all. It is without a smooth surface, closed and similar to others. Unlike others in its neighborhood, there is no temple. It is interesting that its top is finished with one large stone in the shape of a cube, which looks as if it should serve as a pedestal. From the center up was a pyramid of black stone. The bottom and top were of yellow stone, similar to the other pyramids. Compared to the other pyramids, it is located further to the west.

Experts admit the possibility that such a pyramid could exist. However, it is approached as a satellite pyramid, which is, for example, in front of the middle pyramid. In the same way, they question the existence of the other seven to eight pyramids mentioned by Frederic Norden in his book. I do not think this is the case - that it is a satellite pyramid. They have a uniform size and are much smaller than the fourth. I don't think Frederic Norden was wrong.

The fact that the post in Giza looked different is also mentioned Dr. Abd'El Hakim Awayan. He claims that originally in Giza there was a total 9 pyramid. They departed further into the present desert.

If we look at photographic map data from Google, we find that in the place where the fourth pyramid could be found, nothing significant can be seen - such as the ruins of the walls or the stone debris. This, of course, is not decisive, as the maps Google are not accurate. But the question is why this is not publicly explored. It is fully available. The attached drawings show the fourth pyramid relatively accurately.

Robert Boval is the author of the theory that the current three pyramids in Giza are aligned according to the constellation of Orinov's belt. So the question arises as to how this theory would stand if we knew the location of the remaining pyramids that Norden and Hakim were talking about. Hakim himself disputes Boval's theory.

Source: AnonymousFO