The calendar is a very interesting invention. With its help, history can be changed as needed. It is, willingly or unwillingly, a very dangerous tool in the hands of progressors (the Progressors are in the science fiction literature of the highly developed races, whose duties include the support of civilizations at a lower level of development, the term was invented by the brethren Strugatsi. And they use it without a conscience. They used it more precisely. Since the Gregorian calendar has dominated the world, no attempts have been made to change it, but it can only tell one. The necessary goal has been achieved and correction is not necessary yet. It is true that here is one "but" ...

In Israel, they have decided that this foreign European calendar is useless to them, so the Jews continue to use their own, which is 3761 years older than the Gregorian. This means that now in 2017, their year shows 5778.

In Vietnam, Cambodia, China, Korea, Mongolia, Japan, and some other Asian countries, however, they do not consider it necessary to subtract time from a particular point in time. Their time is divided into "sixty-year-olds". One XNUMX-year cycle is over and that's it… It's gone, it goes on and a new countdown from the next sixty years begins.

In China and Japan, calendars were multilevel. The unified calendar began when he ascended the throne of an important emperor, but in parallel with him, another was valid, beginning with the year of the reign of the current emperor.

The Indians were not lucky at all in this. So far, they have their own calendar in each province, which is valid at the same time as the calendars of neighboring provinces, but officially also the Gregorian calendar. However, the most sacred Hindus consider the calendar to be the Samvatic vikram, which began fifty-seven years before the Gregorian calendar.

The Mayan calendar keeps its deduction from a specific date, and that is August 13, 3113 BC Such a "wonderful" date from the European point of view could not fail to give birth to a mass of conjectures and insinuations. (defamation, unreasonable accusations, transcripts) on this subject, but for Maye the number thirteen does not mean anything. It's just a number.

The Arabs began to deduct their 16 Muslim calendar. June 622 and me seem far more "honest" than Christian, which is artificially extended for at least a thousand years.

And the closest calendar to us is, of course, the "from the creation of the world", which is 5508 years longer than the Gregorian one. It is the oldest of the existing and was in a parallel relationship with the Julian until 1918. It was used not only in everyday life, but also in dating state publications and documents.

Personally, I consider all these systems of dates to be completely understandable, explainable and really real in the past, unlike some that historians have written in post factum textbooks. (additionally, noteworthy). Calendars such as ancient Egyptian, ancient Greek, Byzantine, ancient Roman, and the one "from the creation of the world in the Star Temple" seem very dubious to me. It just doesn't fit anywhere at all.

In Constantinople and Rome, a system of indication (fifteen-year cycles) was probably used, which, together with Christianity, was also imported into Russia. I was not the only one to come to such a conclusion. There are even indirect references to this in the official historical literature. In church books, this system worked in parallel with the secular calendar. Its main shortcoming was that, according to the indication, the real date had to be calculated. To obtain an indication of the year in the era since the birth of Christ (era, the first year of the cycle, is 3 year n. l., Note: transl.) it was necessary to add the number three to the given year and divide the result by fifteen. The balance then represented the desired indication of the year. Zero residue meant indication fifteen.

Overall, perhaps no one can object to the claim that the basis of any of the generally accepted systems of dates is religious direction. Christianity is the most widespread religion in the world, so it is no wonder that the Christian calendar has become united throughout the world. And this is where we meet an interesting fact. According to the official historical version, the Christian calendar appeared… forty-five years before the birth of Christ! Yes. That's right.

He tells us that the Julian, as well as the Gregorian calendar that replaced him, counted from the birth of Christ. And this confirms the thesis that the world now lives according to the Christian religious calendar. But how does 1. January 45 BC could discover a Julian calendar before the birth of Christ?

In fact, we can count hundreds of similar errors in official history. Now, in addition, we get meaningless explanations that do not clarify anything, but only complicate the situation. Take, for example, the etymology of the word calendar. According to the official version of the word calend from Latin means the first day of the month. But our people claim that the calendar means the Gift of Koljada. I have nothing against these versions, but I don't believe either. I take note…, but nothing more.

I believe that all this is the fruit of global counterfeiting, which they spun at the end of the 18th century. Just when the process of creating the whole of history, national cultures, languages ​​and states in their current conception began on an unwritten sheet of history. We can clearly trace the main personalities involved in this falsification:

Kateřina II. created myths about Peter I. and the Russian,

Voltaire formed Europe,

Shakespeare created the Anglo-Saxon world.

This is not an error. When we talk to Shakespeare, I mean his (but rather their) theater plays, which at that time played the role of contemporary Hollywood.

Either way, without the widespread distribution of printed works, we can not achieve what we have now. This is a more or less credible testimony that appeared not earlier than in the second half of 18. century. It was at that time that the world knew the ancient Plato, Herodotus and Archimedes. It was at that time that everyone became acquainted with today's most popular myths, including those about Alexander the Macedonian and the Trojan War. Documents containing suspicious fragments, for which scientists must seek explanations, are also included in this period.

Literally everything brings us to ecstasy here! The main thing is that in the 17th century it was the official language at the court of the prince (not the king !!!) in Stokolne (one hundred stakes?) Russian language (Apparently the author means King Charles XI., who ruled in Stockholm until his death in 1697).. Shocking is also the written form of moon noyabra. This is not November. It's a novomirie. For some reason, the Swedes did not count the year from the birth of Christ, but from the incarnation of the God of the Word. And the Words, as many already know, are the original God of the Slavs, whom they also called the Gender. Today, references to him are carefully erased so that no one can understand the meaning of the first lines of the Bible: “In the beginning was the Words. And the Words were God. ”Nevertheless, I managed to gather a whole collection of quotes from books and inscriptions not only from the frescoes, but also from the bells where this god is mentioned.

And now the data… Compare how the number 1 is written at the bottom and the capital letter I at the top of the page. They are identical. Historians say it just comes from economics. Therefore, so that the printers do not have to cast the letter with the number 1, they replace it with the letter I. It would be nothing if there was no other BUT… Let's admit that those who tried to explain it to us are right. But how do they explain other written variants of the data?

Everyone can find hundreds of such examples. The three-digit number is always preceded by either the letter J or I. This is probably due to the first name of the person they called Jesus - Jesus or Jesus. Nothing else to say. Here you have a "thousand years of medieval darkness" that historians simply fail to fill with events. Those years simply did not exist. When Prince Charles died in Stokolne, the year was 697 from the incarnation of God the Word (birth of Christ). This means that it is the 7th and not the 17th century. And the Slavs are not Slaves at all, but Slavs who knew who the God of the Words was. Some made fun of it, some translated it from Russian literally in their ignorance, and an abracadabra was born: “In the beginning was the word. And that word was God. "

Even until recently, it was possible to learn many interesting things from the European Bible. For example, who was the evangelist John. Here is an excerpt from the Gospel of Ostromirus:

Translation of the third line: "He was sent from God. His name was Ivan. "What is Ivan? Is not this priest Jan, who was the right hand of Genghis Khan?

A fragment of a map by Danily Keller from 1590.

We learn from official sources: “Priest John, also known in Russian literature as Tsar Pop Ivan, is the legendary ruler of a powerful Christian state in Central Asia. The place where this empire was located, as well as its personality and epoch, are interpreted differently in numerous short stories and testimonies in different languages. Sometimes he points to real, sometimes to imaginary personalities, often going into fantastic details. "

What does this mean? It is clear whose bell tower stands in the Moscow Kremlin and what Tsar Cannon and Tsar Kolokol mean. After all, they also called Ivan Čaj tea. There is even a legend about him, according to which Ivan the Great was sitting by the fireplace with a cauldron in which water was boiling, and Veles threw the leaves of the plant directly into it from the sky. Ivan tasted what came of it and then drank this tea every day. Since then, this herb has been popularly called Ivan Tea or Car Tea.

It follows from all this that, together with calendars, entire epochs change. Restoring credible testimonies about them is extremely difficult, but we are able to guess something. A simple example: let's take a symbolic, "round" day on a calendar, seven thousand years since the creation of the world. Let's convert it to the current calendar, and what do we see? The year 1492. The year in which the New World seemed to be discovered. What was actually discovered? "Everything is clear," historians say, "Columbus discovered America."

Really? So why isn't the New World called Christoforie? Perhaps Columbus has nothing to do with it, given that his name is more appropriate as an operational pseudonym, or as the rank of officer of the General Staff. After all, Cristóbal de Colomb (Christopher Columbus) literally means Člověk The man carrying the light and the building pillar ’(in Russian is a pillar column, note. transl.). So "a colonizer, carrying a culture of savages". And is it a coincidence that it is 7000?

Let's take a different date. Also so "nice", but this is from the Julian calendar. This is the year 1700. What makes this date significant? By just this year, Russia has renounced 5508 years of its own history. Did it give up or was it banned? If the introduction of the Julian calendar in Russia is "the merit" of Peter I, then why did there be two systems of dates in parallel until the beginning of the 20th century?

And in general… Petra is presented to us as a ruthless Russophobe and a believer in everything Western. So why did he fight his whole life exclusively with the West? For Catherine II. everything was just the opposite. She fought Tartaria, but not Europe. And everything we know about Peter's epoch is drawn from sources dating back to Catherine the Great. And as I said before, she is the founder of the "Russian world" in its current conception. She even used her Prussian language as a model for the whole of Russia. Yes. In Russia today, the Prussian dialect of the Russian language, which was Catherine's own and which, thanks to the efforts of Derzhavin, Pushkin, Gogol, Chekhov, Dostoevsky and Tolstoy, became the only exemplary Russian language. The Ukrainian and Belarusian dialects went "in their own way" until they changed to individual national languages ​​with the efforts of Bolshevik ideologues.

So it's not that easy with Peter. It seems that they made him a Europhile during Catherine's time, who was also a passionate Europhile, and seduced all his sins and all his heroic deeds at the same time. If this is the case, then the idea is inevitably imposed on the fact that we can consider as credible knowledge about history only those that do not show signs of adjustment and also those that have survived from the beginning of the epoch of mass distribution of book printing.

Since then, the level of possible forgery has become much more difficult. It is not possible to destroy or replace tens of thousands of publications at once, stored in cabinets and attics in a vast area. Therefore, the confusion of the calendar, used as a way of manipulating mass consciousness, may have ceased to be relevant. It has been replaced by new technologies, far more efficient and effective. But dokonce It's even awful to think about what will happen if the internet suddenly disappears…

Take a moment to imagine that only the printed editions have been preserved and all electronic reason has disappeared and simply does not exist ... So ... You can read, for example, the old editions of the magazine "Murzilka" (a children's magazine, which is intended for children from 6 to 12 years, similar to our mother-in-law)... or try again to invent a bicycle ...

Kadykchanskiy