I really want to see the movie. But it must first be filmed.

Investigative journalist Massimo Mazzucco, producer / director of a five-hour documentary 11. September: New Pearl Harbor (September 11: The New Pearl Harbor), exercises his great talent in detecting major frauds currently committed. In a new movie called American Moon (American Moon) examines all fraudulent evidence from Apollo missions.

"When we realize the importance of being able to unleash such a vast mystification around the world in the 60s, we will understand far more of the things they were able to do, including 11/XNUMX," Mazzuco said during an interview at his home in Italy.

"Mystery related to the Moon has such far-reaching dimensions as nothing else that has ever happened in history. By making this public, I think we are preparing a good ground for those who need to open their eyes a little to see what's going on. "

Mazzucco is currently seeking funding to complete the project, despite working on it for more than a year. He hopes the film could hit theaters during 2016. He raises funds through the gofundme website. The estimated budget of the film is $ 75,000. Marzzucco claims to be able to shoot even if he only gets $ 30,000 to cover only basic expenses. You can also contribute financially to the film. Here you can look at the introduction of the project.

Movie American Moon he deals with several different types of evidence, which he examines carefully, especially photographic records, which are very important to Mazzucca, because he himself was a professional photographer for more than 20 years. From his research, which he had already done, he concluded that not all photographs and television images from the Moon had been taken on him at all.

"The images don't come from the moon - none of them. Not from Apollo 11 to 17. "

But then he adds: "I'm not saying that we never flew to the moon. There are many variations, but my theory is that the Apollo missions as such, which were issued as missions to the moon, certainly were not. "

NASA's Mazzucco bought all the TV footage they allegedly took on the moon (estimated at between 20 and 30 hours of material). He inspected all the film materials carefully. At first glance, it was immediately clear to him that all the lunar photographs were fake.

"If you explore these endless hours of material, you will realize how many things they do not agree with. My problem is that it's easy for me to be a professional and a photographer. It is a nut to persuade the general public, among whom are not only experts. "

The film producer adds that he has already started communicating with some photographers with whom he has worked in the past. He talked to them about the evaluation of materials.

"Mostly, when they saw the pictures, they started laughing," he says. "If you are a professional photographer and you look at those shots, then you have to start laughing. It's just a joke. I'd like to put it all right. "

The crucial thing is that “11.9. The Truth Movement ’(truthers) and those investigating "false flag" operations are very reluctant to question the Apollo mission to the moon. Finally, it will be very interesting to see how members of the Movement for Truth respond to Mazzucco's talk on the matter. While there are a significant number of members of the movement who do not believe we have flown to the moon, many fear that if they admit it, their popularity will suffer.

Mazzucco says he has wanted to make a film about the Moon Mysticism for 10 years, but he has always come up with something much more important at work. He immediately adds that he will definitely make it to the finals. And if he's ever supposed to do it, now is the time. Especially when in 2019 will be the 50th anniversary of the first launch.

One of the most striking things about Apollo 11 was the behavior of the three astronauts after they returned to Earth. On press conference, which was arranged just after their return, Niel Amstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins looked very depressed. You would not expect anything like that from men who have done such a spectacular act.

"These people are honest people," says Mazzucco. "These men got into something much bigger than themselves. It was too late to realize that they could not back down and that they were forced to continue playing this game. "

One of the biggest oddities about the alleged Monthly Missions is that no one has tried to "return" there in the past 43 years. There may be help in recent NASA videos about the Orion mission to transport astronauts to Mars. In the video Orion: Trial by Fire, NASA engineer Kelly Smith, who works on navigation and leadership in the Orion project, made the following striking statement:

"When we get further from Earth, we will then fly through Van Allen's belts, a region that is dangerous because of its radiation. Such radiation can damage the navigation system, onboard computers or other electronics on Orion. Of course, you must pass through this dangerous zone twice, once on your way back and forth. But Orion has protection, the shield will be tested as soon as Orion begins to penetrate the waves of radiation. Sensors on board will record radiation levels for later scientific purposes. We have to solve these problems before we send people into this area in space. "

In his series "Wagging the Moondoggie," Dave McGowan pointed to the fact that in the 50s, they developed a technology that used Apollo astronauts to get through this area of ​​"dangerous radiation." Almost XNUMX years ago, they managed it without any protective shield. Today, it seems impossible to redesign this technology.

Mazzucco asks, "If it's true that it was safe in 1969 and we accepted it, why is NASA now worried and requires special studies before sending people through the area?"

The approach he has is quite different from what you will see with many other documentaries who are investigating frauds and conspiracies. It does not show only the case based on the examination of the evidence, it also examines and responds to the speeches presented by the so-called "debunkers". Then he answers the debunkers. He says his philosophy is such that he only uses / admits discussion if he has irreversible arguments against what the debunkers said. This technique was very effective in film New Pearl Harbor.

"The main thing I learned from 11/9 is that I simply can't reveal what I think about it and what's wrong. You also need to consider what the debunkers' response is, or would be, the particular accusation you are trying to make. And if you can also sweep their answers off the table, you've just won. "

Documentary programs by Italian filmmakers help us detect fraud, so we can reduce our chances of being deceived in the future.

"All my films have one thread in common, which are all big lies in history. As a result, the more lies you are able to see and the more lies they are, the more I hope people will be more vigilant before they believe the other ones. The main reason for my films, which I make, is to make people less naive, ”says Mazzucco.

The director has created a series of documentaries in which enormous lies are spoken. The movie that is probably most famous for him is called New Pearl Harbor. His other films include The New American Century (The New American Century), Cancer - The Forbidden Cures, The True History of Marijuana, Second Dallas - Who killed RFK? (The Second Dallas - Who Killed RFK?), UFO and military elite (UFOs and the Military Elite).

Mazzucco, in his latest film, will show how the whole story is fake and at the same time draws attention to many other areas of Apollo's testimony. One of these is clear evidence that the cables used to hang astronauts were used. Cables also served to pick up astronauts and stand on their feet.

"You can not prove directly that they used the cables. But there were situations where you could not get up or move as much as you wanted without the help of cables. So you can actually prove that the cables are there, even if you can not see them directly. "

One topic that often appeared was the crucial question of whether the light could really have come from the Sun and whether the shadows could contradict the claim that the images were taken on the Moon. Mazzucco called the matter essential when he said that sometimes shadows could appear to converge, especially when a light source came from behind the camera. The reason for this convergence is the perspective effect. But as he adds, several shades seem to diverge in different directions, and they certainly can't be the result of perspective.

The key clue that reveals that light is artificial is clear when "hotspots" appear - places where the surface is brighter than other places that are closer to the observer. This suggests that the cause is a light source that is very close - which the Sun is not.

"If you use artificial lighting and it does not matter how powerful it can be, the resulting image will surely find the place where the light will come. At the same time, it is not possible to use more light sources without creating several shadows at the same time. That's why you'll remove them. "

Another point of contention is the extremely high and low temperatures that appear on the moon. These would certainly make the Hasselblad camera definitely out of order - and many other things wouldn't.

One of the most dramatic pieces of evidence that the Apollo missions were a hoax is the film material received by NASA researcher Bart Sibel. Sibrel says he was sent a movie that the public was not supposed to see. It depicts Apollo 11, allegedly halfway to the moon, about 209 kilometers from Earth. We can see the Earth at a considerable distance, and Armstrong can be heard involuntarily saying that the camera is filming through a single window facing the Earth. But then the lights in the space cabin come on and you can see that the camera was placed at the opposite end of the vessel. Light appears to be flowing through the window, which is probably reflected from the Earth with the spacecraft in low Earth orbit. It also appears that some translucent material has been attached to the window.

It is possible to see the 32 minute record of Barta Sibrela in the movie On the way to the moon it became a funny thing (A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon) and in a 13-minute recording of a documentary What happened on the moon (What Happened on the Moon).

if it is New Pearl Harbor a sign of the professional and thorough analysis that Mazzucco is trying to achieve in the case of the Apollo missions, then it will definitely be interesting to see the film American Moon.