Definition: Mimicry is a term used mainly in animals, where two objects of different species resemble each other, to evoke false ideas about the nature of the object that uses mimicry. The purpose is usually to protect against the enemy (appearance, color, behavior.)

 Vadim Derezhinsky

One of the most amazing features of UFOs is mimicry - an imitation of something familiar in our environment, for example, our expectations of what extraterrestrials should look like. In addition, it is the basic property of UFO, something to deceive, it is the very essence of UFO, its property, used in close encounters with contactors. As the author of these lines thinks, not only the appearance of the UFO is dependent on the consciousness of the contacters, but the whole contact is only the communication of the contactor himself, with himself. All of this is a manifestation of false information about UFOs.

Triangular UFOs in Belarus

The subject of this reflection is according to the UFO observation letter in Belarus sent to 24. March 2004. Our reader from Berezino from the Minsk region, Zoja R. Něstěrovičová remembers:

"In the papers, a lot of space was devoted to issues related to the UFO issue. I'm not particularly interested in this topic. Only when someone gives me something UFO randomly, then I read it ... I support the attitude of journalists that UFOs are not just alien ships. And the phenomenon I could observe, I just confirm it.

In the newspaper, you described a UFO that I could observe a little earlier. It happened in late November or early December 1991 or 1992, at that time I was in my first semester at university. Around seven o'clock in the evening I drove home from Minsk to Berezin. It was already quite dark. For some reason I couldn't find anything else to do, so I was looking out the bus windows. Of course, I couldn't see almost anything outside the window, but I was just staring into the darkness for no apparent reason. Suddenly I noticed to the left of the bus, where I was sitting on the left a glowing object that came from nowhere and began to move towards the bus.

Now that I am analyzing the whole event, I can safely say that it has appeared from nowhere. I was still looking out the window, and of course I would have noticed if such a large illuminated object flew through the sky. But it appeared strangely. At first, the front illuminated part appeared, the back was hard to guess because there was no light on it. After the object was slowly heading for the bus, it was bright all bright. The object flew very slowly and was very large. I do not have a good estimate, so I can only determine the size. The object appeared on the bus in close proximity and flew slowly, the bus was driving at speeds of about 70 to 75 km per hour, yet I looked at the object for about a minute or a little less.

The object was a triangle with rounded corners. I felt very flat. On all three sides there was a kind of light device in a slightly convex shape. The lights were red, but they only related to the object, the darkness around them did not distract. I have seen the bottom of the building very well. There were several hatches, some hemispheres, all illuminated, as well as the sides of the building. There was a door at the bottom that was illuminated from above by two lamps placed on either side of the door. Although it was not entirely clear if it was the bottom part of the building, why were all those hatches and the bright light?

The object was dark gray, had a matte finish. This material could, as I determined at first glance, be either plastic or metal. As the object flew over the bus, it seemed to lose its brightness and gradually begin to melt away. The conclusion was clear. The purpose of the object or the person who controlled it was to draw attention to itself. What would all the lighting be for? Probably not to collide with another such flying object. Aircraft do not fly at such a low altitude. And if the object was to alert someone, then someone was me, or who?

On the bus, I was driving 10-15 people beside me, but none of them noticed the object except me. And I simply did not think of turning to the other passengers because it seemed to me to be an ordinary phenomenon. And if the aim was to attract my attention, then what? I've been writing to you for two years, but doing something else with most of this information is impossible.

If we take Smilovich as the starting point, the object was observed somewhat before we reached them, maybe later. The object looked very unnatural, like an artificial one, so I do not think it could be an alien ship. I would be very grateful if you could comment on my report. "

 (Newspaper comment.)

We do not want to talk about the observation of triangular UFOs in Belarus. Often, this appearance of UFOs has also been observed in other countries. Recently, the press has announced that triangular UFOs are machines from the Pentagon. Maybe there are some secret triangular machines in the US, but they are obviously not what our witnesses see. If the object our reader saw was a really secret American plane conducting a survey in the center of Belarus, it would probably not be a bright spotlight. It is hard to believe that such lights the machine needs in order to avoid collision with another machine if its flight level can only be operated visually. Finally, American fighters and stealth bombers fly without any positional lights, otherwise it would be absurd, to make a huge effort to get the plane out of the radar screen, but it would be pointless if the pilots themselves pointed out the positional lights.

Perhaps it was a secret Belarusian technique, but it would not fly in front of a bus where spies could travel, opposition, foreigners from NATO and other "enemies of the people". In one such demonstration flight, the squadron commander could go to court. In addition, secret technology could explode over the heads of civilians during tests, collide with one of the factory chimneys, or simply disobey and crash into the city - so the flight path of all military aircraft is strictly determined.

They are precisely designated forbidden zones where no civil or military aircraft are allowed to fly. Nobody at all. All flights are controlled by a ground center. In other words, it cannot be earthly technology. In addition, in another case, when our readers saw a triangular UFO at Orshi, it remained in the air just above the ground and, according to witnesses, sent a sharp, "tangible" beam that damaged the eyes of the witnesses. They took one faint woman to the hospital, and when she regained consciousness, she said she had seen strange aliens in the night who invited her to fly with them. The beam touched the woman's hand, paralyzed it and required long-term treatment, so it wasn't a common spotlight. Such a beam is typical of almost all UFOs and is apparently not an earthly product.

Absurdity

However, it was an instrument and not an alien vessel. The reader clearly stated his unreality, alienation. This means that what is not real is a scam. In addition, the object evoked not only a visual impression, but also functionally it was an attraction. The aim of everything we think was to create the impression that someone is sitting and driving there, there are some rivets, circuits and motors, including the crew of "little green men." First: this device was flat as a board. All the doors below are functionally absurd and do not go anywhere. It seemed to be copied from some illustrations for the 1950 sci-fi novel or as an impression from the memory of the contacters. Exactly the same functional nonsense are mostly UFOs. Rivets on board, riveted steel doors (in one of the highly credible Belarusian contacts) look like images of enemy ships before 1940, when we replaced the riveting by welding. Of the other cases, extraterrestrial suits are also known with two antennas on their heads. So we were displaying future astronauts and aliens at a time when no cosmic technology was removed from these absurd antennas.

Today, for example, we have mobile phones that do not need an external antenna, so what do they do on their heads during interstellar flights? They are not even on the heads of our astronauts, for functional reasons, because these antennas on the heads of astronauts are dangerous, inconvenient and non-functional. There are many such examples. Their nature is at odds with the technology of interstellar flights, with the primitive technology used by these "aliens". In addition, these extraterrestrial technologies are copying our advanced technologies with tremendous accuracy, and we are usually behind 30-40 years - as in the previous example with rivets (as in the case of tanks, aircraft and ships until 1940), in this example also with external antennas on the heads of alien suits, etc.

With a great deal of imagination, it would be able to defend the theory of extraterrestrial ships. For example, I could consider the ufology offered by the UFO as a "helper stick" that UFOs are really alien vessels that simply do not want to show their technology and therefore show us the instruments created during our progressive progress that will inevitably have a devastating effect on the course of our evolution . We will cease to develop on the basis of our own internal laws when we put into it an external element that not only disturbs our development but can also destroy our civilization because every technology exactly matches the level of cultural and social development of society - aftermath.

This is probably the reason aliens are hiding our right face - their technological perfection, and showing us their machines with technology similar to our science fiction. This means that even the appearance of foreigners is based on our earthly contemporary ideas of how they should look from our point of view.

This is a rather serious attitude to the defense of aliens, which no ufologist has ever expressed in the world. This attitude is responsible, including questions about why there has not yet been any official contact that will of course never be. But, as shown below, it is much more complicated. For the first time, he named it author of this article when the issue of UFO relationship is much more ambitious and does not concern only one technology. It means there are many technological secrets.

UFO mimicry

If it were only one technological secret, it would be possible to assume that in other aspects of contacts there is no props but a realistic, reflective intention of the forces behind the UFO. Here are the following aspects:

- Appearance of UFO pilots, their interactions with humans, their behavior on Earth.

- What races are UFO crews? It might seem that this is a stupid question, as is often seen in all dead or half-dead unusual creatures from the crews (including something like a kind of "robots") that, even if all are different, on a case-by-case basis our perverted fantasy, but each of them generally gives the impression of some props.

- They do not lack, as I would say, a certain degree of reality, but for the ordinary human eye they are always some unfinished species, rather bad in nature, one word inanimate. But there's another kind of UFO "pilot" who has a human face and seems to be quite normal. Based on this discrepancy, other ufologists suggest that the "non-living" are "biorobots" or simply alien robots of the usual earthly appearance that come into contact with us. It occurs here and there a very interesting question: what nationalities these are pilots UFO?

Among white men, it was obvious that contacts with UFOs were about contacts with white men. We are not racists, God, forgive me. In Europe, Russia and the United States, where the white population prevails, it seemed natural that the aliens are also white people (theoretical paleo-contacts on this basis believe that the white race is the offspring of the aliens, mingling with the local Neanderthals).

In fact, it can be demonstrated that if Neanderthals still lived in today's world, they would fly to them on plates a triangles, similar Neanderthals in beautiful dresses or spacesuits. Generally speaking, I could mention the ancient fact that frequent mass visions, such as the Virgin Mary, especially in religious areas of Europe, where the Virgin Mary does not look like a Jew with Semitic features from the Middle East 2000 years ago, but as a common European - Slavic, Romanesque or Norman type. In the north, her blond hair and green eyes predominate. In central Russia, the Kaluga and Ryazan regions usually look like a race living there - a Finnish non-Indo-European round face, blond eyes and hair. And so it is with UFO crews.

It is the embodiment of general ideas. In this case, religious, but also extraterrestrial. For known reasons, contemporary ufology draws data from printed information, from a communicatively connected world. The facts about the aliens flying in Africa, who are black, remain aside. In China, aliens look like Chinese, and in the Arab world, they are Arabs. And they all speak without accent the mother tongue of the natives.

Europeans were alerted to contacts in 1990, when UFO "pilots" in Estonia had a non-Indo-European appearance to the Finns, were like Estonians and spoke pure Finnish. The contacts in Dagestan gathered by AK Primov were of the same nature - in contact with the locals, however, they did not look like Estonian cosmonauts, but had the appearance of Dagestans and spoke purely Dagestan. In Armenia, the aliens looked like Armenians, and in Georgia they looked like Georgians.

Interestingly, Arab aliens in Turkey and Azerbaijan have not only had these national features, but they have been reverently speaking about the Quran and Allah. I could believe that aliens learn the language of small nations, such as the Estonians or the Dagestans, to teach them perfectly, without any defects or accent, but just to accumulate dozens of meaningless sentences. But how can it be understood that Estonians come to Estonian aliens and Georgia to Georgia?

In an effort to clarify these peculiarities, some people began to believe that it was the soul of the dead. This means the dead who, after death, live peacefully on other planets where they are ethnically divided, I think it is already in principle. It is unlikely that something more stupid would be possible. Aliens, of course, can speak in any language even though they are foreigners. But no alien can be Estonec or Dagestan.

Let my ufologists forgive me, but they can not be either Russian or American aliens, born of our ethnic genes. For this reason, science for good reason rejects all these contacts, simply explaining its ideas or, at best, is convinced that these hallucinations are the basis of some unknown physical or psychological processes.

Because the ufologists themselves, who cling to classical extraterrestrial theory, cannot explain this so as not to suffer the shame in the eyes of science, they hide these facts and include them all under different theories. I myself have seen these scams several times in ufological databases, where, for example, the writer gives a detailed report, according to which aliens with Kazakh features who spoke Kazakh came out of the plate in Kazakhstan. Russian ufologists playfully "lost" the mention of the nationality of newly arrived Kazakhs, which can be considered a common denominator with other similar events in other countries. Although the most important information has been lost, which would serve to better understand what a UFO is.

Communication and Behavior of "Foreigners"

All contacts that were already tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, and each ended always alike, by inviting them to fly with them. Where? Why? An understandable answer is never, but the answer is - to become a kind of domestic animal. Here it is fly with us, there is only one external challenge in this contact. The rest of the communications content is only terrestrial - human.

From their point of view, it is only one thing - to take a human hand and hold it like a sweet toy from the wild. We also entice dogs or birds to approach us. This, by the way, completely refutes the concept of the church, which has labeled UFOs and contacts with UFOs as a conspiracy of the devil, which seeks to divert man from the womb of faith. It is not necessary to consider every invitation of aliens to travel with them as part of the control.

Influenza and abduction are fundamentally different. Influenced, in accordance with the concept of clergy, he must remain on earth to weaken human faith. Aliens invite everyone to flee Earth, leave the Earth, but all witnesses have not escaped (I do not know how many have really left) because they have refused. So where is the influence? There is no logic for it, nor are there any machinace the devil. I think extraterrestrials have found other ways to implement their evil plans more efficiently.

The motive for the abduction of the people of Earth is contact, not just influence. Our UFOs - Eccentric UFO researchers (ufoman and the ufologist are two different types of people), he writes either that UFOs protect us and are the bearers lights with truth or environmentalists (eg UFOs flying over Belarusian swamps to show our mistakes in draining Belarusian swamps), or, conversely, intimidate the population with the early arrival of alien populations on Earth, other aggressors and catastrophes in which aliens give implants, maim cattle, abduct people and inhuman experiments.

However, the intentions of the aliens do not need to be invented or proven, they are known and are always the same, whether they are Georgian or Estonian aliens. It's the same - everyone fly with us! There is nothing more. It's just an interest in tourists trapped in a protected landscape area, or an interest in a child who came to the zoo. We should realize that they are a civilization, standing a few orders of magnitude higher in their development than we are, where a common language with them cannot exist in principle - as between your five-year-old son who visited the zoo and a frog behind glass. What can a frog understand in this communication?

Nothing except for two things - peace and invitation to yourself (come with us) or aggression, which is not usually observed in contact with UFOs. That's the whole language. And we are like a frog who cannot have more knowledge from these contacts and its evolutionary development will not be affected either. And this is a representative formula for the next phase of development. We are aware of the hopeless nonsense that comes from our consciousness. I remind you that speech and language are technologies that use the general idea of ​​communication in images as a basis. Our presentation of images uses the limited abilities of the brain, which, of course, cannot be compared to an evolutionarily more advanced civilization. From this dialogue, we can only understand benevolently fly with us or aggression. There is no common language, so it is not possible to transfer all the information in principle.

We, people, speak according to ethnic groups in their native language and agree on the images we all understand, and these pictures are pictograms. I'm sure extraterrestrial intelligence, in contact with UFOs, did not learn any ethnic language. It refers, at the time of contact, to mere images in our consciousness and subconscious and our own communication technology, influencing our subconscious understanding of not only their speech, but in general their thoughts. It seems to confirm the existence of the next, fourth degree of matter, following the first inanimate, the second alive and the third reasonable, the spirit. Evolution means qualitative differences in levels. And our guests (or are they the creators?) Have had more time for this development.

CONTACT

The contact we have been waiting for so long already exists. But we have no proof of that. Contactors (especially participants in close encounters with UFOs) are really in contact with extraterrestrial intelligence, but paradoxically, they communicate in this pseudo-contact only with themselves, in their consciousness and subconscious. No grains of information about the aliens, apart from the fact that they exist, we have not yet received and basically we can not get into their community, because when meeting in close contact with UFOs, people only come into contact with themselves, with their reflection. Ufologists are afraid of this the moment of truth. They are ready to consider all sorts of other options, natural, extraterrestrial, but they also hide as ostrich heads in the sand.

Because the whole problem of UFOs lies solely and exclusively in close contact, of which there is an immeasurable number and not at all in distant observations, whether it is Venus or Soviet missiles. There is no general interest in this. Many of today's well-known ufologists with whom I have communicated have honestly admitted that they do not have the question of close contacts now. interest, and prefer writing about the Tunguz meteorite, plasmoids, chemtrails, and other things that have nothing to do with the main direction of ufology-exploring close contacts.

It's a strange ufology where ufologists are on their winding path, and they are reluctant to move on to the main straight path. In addition, AK Primov, who has gathered knowledge more than 20 years, but himself is not considered a ufologist, has given such an explanation, with which everything stands and falls from the point of view of the logic of these matters. It seems to me that the problem it is up to is finally to recognize the fact that UFOs are just mimicry. This is the starting point for all further studies. This gives us lessons not only from past mistakes, but also opens up possibilities for truly productive study of real phenomena.

We need to create a new concept of UFO as the subject of false ideas of human consciousness. There may be different options, different possible explanations, one of which is inevitably one. But first, we must admit that UFOs are just mimics in human consciousness. This understanding, I am sure, is not only a real basis in the UFO but it is the basis of a new concept of real contacts and space in our universe.

Note: Editor: All used pictures are for illustration only.