Sueneé: Nick Pope, a man who worked at the British Department of Defense at the Department of Defense at the turn of the 1980s and 1990s to deal with the collection and analysis of all possible reports of unidentifiable flying objects UFO. His task was to assess whether these reports pose a potential threat to the UK, whether at military or civilian level. As it says in itself: "I am probably one of the few informants in the field of exopolitics who can rightly claim to have worked on real Aktech X. "

Nick Pope claims to himself that he has never systematically dealt with the topic of extraterrestrial civilizations. He himself (at that time) labeled himself as a great skeptic who assumed that all the observations that have been recorded so far are only misinterpreted aircraft or meteorological phenomena.

The more he read through the individual writings, the deeper the case, he had to admit that for some of them there was no meaningful conventional explanation.

Nick Pope: "Of the entire collection of documents that have gone through my hands, there are at least five of the most interesting cases in which I believe it must have been something very exceptional that does not fall within the intentions of ordinary explanations. It must have been something for which the most natural explanation is that it was an extraterrestrial object or a completely physical phenomenon unknown to us. "

He considers his most important case he has ever studied incident in the Rendlesham Forest. This case is currently considered the British equivalent of the American Incident in Roswell. That's why he's sometimes referred to as British Roswell.

The incident occurred during December 1980 near the Royal Air Force Base (RAF) in Bantwaters, near Woodbridge (Suffolk County). The US Air Force squadron operated on this military base.

During this incident, there was a series of observations over several nights, during which several army men saw the lights in the sky. These lights made high-speed unusual maneuvers. During the first night of this event, several observers saw a structured metallic object that did not move in the sky, but just above the ground. A smaller metallic object of triangular shape wandered through Rendlesham Forest, which was part of the military space, it was then possible to observe its landing in this forest.

All witnesses to this event were soldiers who were trained to watch and definitely did not belong to people who made mistakes. Some skeptics suggested that the whole thing could be just a poorly interpreted light beacon, which was located near the coast. But that does not make sense for two reasons: First - there were military-trained observers who knew about the existence of the lighthouse and saw it many times every night. They knew what it looked like and how it manifested itself through the forest when they went on patrol. And secondly - At least in one case, the light beacon was seen simultaneously with the observed ETV object. So it is obvious that it could not be a light beacon and the skeptics did not.

From left: Nick Pope, James Penniston and Charles Halt

Personally, I find the physical evidence most important in this case. After landing on the ground and flying back into the morning light, he left three triangular footprints on the ground in the woods that supported the spacecraft. If you stretched a taut rope between these depressions, the resulting pattern would form an almost perfect equilateral triangle. Increased radiation was also measured on site. The measured radiation values ​​were ten times higher than the background radiation values. Although these were relatively low levels of radiation, there were still elevated values ​​at the site.

Lieutenant Charles Halt at that time worked for Radiological Protection Service, which fell below Ministry of Defense. It was he who took the ship's drawings on the scene.

The Air Force report on the incident in Rendlesham

An important detail is that the vessel was observed on a radar near the base RAF Watten. They saw the thing on the radar and trained trained militarily trained people. The day after the incident was measured by scientific evidence of increased radiation. According to all standards, this was a very unambiguous case.

I had testimony from soldiers. Personally, I have heard testimony from some of these witnesses outside of the official record, when they provided much more detailed confirmatory information than they were in witness testimonies.