1. According to NASA, no light-emitting diodes were lit to the moon, as the missions were on a lunar day and were unnecessary. Besides, battery capacity and weight restrictions did not allow it.
2. A lot of photographs should be taken on the moon. Many of them capture the Sun.
3. Apollo “The Sun” looks completely different from the normal Sun, let alone the intense Sun in the Universe. The real Sun can heat the Moon up to 130 ° C, so it's really intense.

 

Let's look at a series of official photos from Mission Apollo. They are to represent the Sun over the surface of the Moon.

On the other hand, the photos of the Sun from other missions, even the Earth, look completely different.

 

For comparison, let's take a look at the photos from Earth. In one photo, the sun is even behind the clouds and the resulting effect is the same.

 

 

So what's so weird about those photos? When we compare the photos from Earth and from the Universe, the Sun looks the same. When we make the same comparison with the Sun on the Moon, there is something different at first glance. And let's realize that we have atmosphere and clouds on Earth. All this is not the official statement on the moon. Still, the photos of the Sun of the Universe look very similar.

When you focus on the center of the white disk, you will notice a distinct white point and then concentric circles on the graded light intensity. This is a typical phenomenon for a reflector (bulb). The real sun would be either a movie fired completely (the photo would be overwhelmed) and / or using the aperture would be much weaker. The sun always has a uniform color in the photos. In addition, the light from the sun is on the photos spreads in the rays (to the star), whereas from the bulb in the concentric circles.

We'll take a graphic editor (such as Photoshop) to help. We upload some of NASA's photos and focus on the alleged sun. Using curves, we change the input setting to 247-249 and output to 0. It is to be seen that there is a hot spot in the middle of the light source that shines and even reflects on the left side of the reflector. Take a look at the following series of photos where the sequence is changed Enhanced colors using a curve.

 

You're probably thinking, "What's the point of the last photo when there's nothing to see?" This is because what shines there is not the Sun. At 251 we no longer see anything. When we do the same with the real Sun on Earth or in the Universe, we can easily recognize the source of the light. Even the stellar blur is preserved.

 

Compare it once again with NASA photos at the same curve values. We get two hot spots. Why? Because they are two reflectors.

 

The sun does not reach a concentrated (single point) source of energy, nor can we get the classic photos of the hot spots. It follows that these NASA photos from Apollo do not portray the Sun. These are reflectors. Reflectors that were never on the real Moon.

The original discovery of this phenomenon was made by the YouTube user greenmagos. He also highlighted discrepancies in size and hopping of reflectors on astronaut visors. From this it was obvious that the reflectors were used instead of the sun. Unfortunately, these videos were censored by YT, as well as everything that is inconsistent with the dogmas that have been experienced ...

 

According to the discussion: Forum WorldHardware